IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0241408.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Six years of measuring patient experiences in Belgium: Limited improvement and lack of association with improvement strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Astrid Van Wilder
  • Kris Vanhaecht
  • Dirk De Ridder
  • Bianca Cox
  • Jonas Brouwers
  • Fien Claessens
  • Dirk De Wachter
  • Svin Deneckere
  • Dirk Ramaekers
  • Else Tambuyzer
  • Ilse Weeghmans
  • Luk Bruyneel

Abstract

Objective: To examine trends in patient experiences in the period 2014–2019, describe improvement strategies implemented by hospitals in the same period, and study associations between patient experiences and implemented strategies. Design: Multi-center retrospective region-wide observational design. Setting: Flanders, Belgium. Participants: 44 out of 46 Flemish acute-care hospitals publicly reporting patient experiences via the Flemish Patient Survey (FPS). Main outcome measure(s): Primary outcomes were the two global FPS ratings: percentage of patients rating the hospital 9 or 10 and percentage of patients definitely recommending the hospital. Secondary outcomes were the average top-box score percentages for each of the 8 remaining dimensions of the FPS. Results: Between 2014 and 2019, there was a significant improvement in patients scoring the hospital 9 or 10 (56% to 61%) and patients definitely recommending (67% to 70%) the hospital. Significant increases in patient experiences over time were also observed in other dimensions, except for the dimension discharge. Hospital key informants reported various improvement strategies related to patient experiences with care and the FPS. Feedback to nursing wards (n = 44, 100%) and clinicians (n = 39, 89%) were most common. Overall, most improvement strategies were not or only weakly associated with patient experience ratings in 2019 and changes in ratings over time. Still, positive associations were discovered between the strategies ‘nursing ward interventions’ and ‘hospital wide education’ and recommendation of the hospital. Conclusions: Patient experiences have improved modestly in Flemish acute-care hospitals. Hospitals report to have invested in patient experience improvement strategies but positive associations between such strategies and FPS scores are weak, although there is potential in further exploring nursing ward interventions and hospital wide education. Hospitals should continue their efforts to improve the patient’s experience, but with a more targeted approach, taking the lessons learned on the efficacy of strategies into consideration.

Suggested Citation

  • Astrid Van Wilder & Kris Vanhaecht & Dirk De Ridder & Bianca Cox & Jonas Brouwers & Fien Claessens & Dirk De Wachter & Svin Deneckere & Dirk Ramaekers & Else Tambuyzer & Ilse Weeghmans & Luk Bruyneel, 2020. "Six years of measuring patient experiences in Belgium: Limited improvement and lack of association with improvement strategies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0241408
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0241408
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0241408&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0241408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luk Bruyneel & Else Tambuyzer & Ellen Coeckelberghs & Dirk De Wachter & Walter Sermeus & Dirk De Ridder & Dirk Ramaekers & Ilse Weeghmans & Kris Vanhaecht, 2017. "New Instrument to Measure Hospital Patient Experiences in Flanders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Allanson & Richard Cookson, 2022. "Comparing healthcare quality: A common framework for both ordinal and cardinal data with an application to primary care variation in England," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(12), pages 2593-2608, December.
    2. Seth Ayisi Addo & Reidar Johan Mykletun & Espen Olsen, 2021. "Validation and Adjustment of the Patient Experience Questionnaire (PEQ): A Regional Hospital Study in Norway," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-19, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0241408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.