IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0239203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility, reproducibility and validity of the 10 meter Shuttle Test in mild to moderately impaired people with stroke

Author

Listed:
  • Harriet Wittink
  • Tim Blatter
  • Jacqueline Outermans
  • Mariella Volkers
  • Paul Westers
  • Olaf Verschuren

Abstract

Background: There currently is no field test available for measuring maximal exercise capacity in people with stroke. Objective: To determine the feasibility, reproducibility and validity of the Shuttle Test (ST) to measure exercise capacity in people with stroke. Design: Longitudinal study design. Setting: Rehabilitation department, day care centres from a nursing home and private practices specialized in neuro rehabilitation. Subjects: People with subacute or chronic stroke. Interventions: A standardized protocol was used to determine feasibility, reproducibility and validity of the 10-meter Shuttle Test (10mST). Main measures: Number of shuttles completed, 1stVentilatory Threshold (1stVT). Results: The associations of the number of shuttles completed and cardiopulmonary capacity as measured with a portable gas analyser were r > 0.7, confirming good convergent validity in subacute and chronic people with stroke. Criterion validity, however, indicates it is not a valid test for measuring maximal cardiopulmonary capacity (VO2max). Only 60% of participants were able to reach the 1stVT. Higher cardiopulmonary capacity and a higher total score of the lower extremity Motricity Index contributed significantly to a higher number of shuttles walked (p = 0.001). Conclusions: The Shuttle Test may be a safe and useful exercise test for people after stroke, but may not be appropriate for use with people who walk slower than 2 km/h or 0.56 m/s.

Suggested Citation

  • Harriet Wittink & Tim Blatter & Jacqueline Outermans & Mariella Volkers & Paul Westers & Olaf Verschuren, 2020. "Feasibility, reproducibility and validity of the 10 meter Shuttle Test in mild to moderately impaired people with stroke," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239203
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239203
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239203&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0239203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.