IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0237534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unfavorable outcomes to second-line tuberculosis therapy among HIV-infected versus HIV-uninfected patients in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Dumessa Edessa
  • Mekonnen Sisay
  • Yadeta Dessie

Abstract

Background: Drug resistance is a key obstacle to the global target set to end tuberculosis by 2030. Clinical complexities in drug-resistant tuberculosis and HIV-infection co-management could worsen outcomes of second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs. A comprehensive estimate for risks of unsuccessful outcomes to second-line tuberculosis therapy in HIV-infected versus HIV-uninfected patients is mandatory to address such aspects in segments of the target set. Therefore, this meta-analysis was aimed to estimate the pooled risk ratios of unfavorable outcomes to second-line tuberculosis therapy between HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods: We conducted a literature search from PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Google Scholar. We screened the retrieved records by titles and abstracts. Finally, we assessed eligibility and quality of full-text articles for the records retained by employing appraisal checklist of the Joanna Briggs Institute. We analyzed the data extracted from the included studies by using Review Manager Software, version 5.3 and presented our findings in forest and funnel plots. Protocol for this study was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42020160473). Results: A total of 19 studies with 1,766 from 4,481 HIV-infected and 1,164 from 3,820 HIV-uninfected patients had unfavorable outcomes. The risk ratios we estimated between HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected drug-resistant tuberculosis patients were 1.18 (95% CI: 1.07–1.30; I2 = 48%; P = 0.01) for the overall unfavorable outcome; 1.50 (95% CI: 1.30–1.74) for death; 0.66 (95% CI: 0.38–1.13) for treatment failure; and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74–0.92) for loss from treatment. Variable increased risks of unfavorable outcomes estimated for subgroups with significance in mixed-age patients (RR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.10–1.36) and eastern region of sub-Saharan Africa (RR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.23–1.75). Conclusions: We found a higher risk of unfavorable treatment outcome in drug-resistant tuberculosis patients with death highly worsening in HIV-infected than in those HIV-uninfected patients. The risks for the unfavorable outcomes were significantly higher in mixed-age patients and in the eastern region of sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, special strategies that reduce the risks of death should be discovered and implemented for HIV and drug-resistant tuberculosis co-infected patients on second-line tuberculosis therapy with optimal integration of the two programs in the eastern region of sub-Saharan Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Dumessa Edessa & Mekonnen Sisay & Yadeta Dessie, 2020. "Unfavorable outcomes to second-line tuberculosis therapy among HIV-infected versus HIV-uninfected patients in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0237534
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237534
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237534&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0237534?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fergal J Duffy & Ethan G Thompson & Thomas J Scriba & Daniel E Zak, 2019. "Multinomial modelling of TB/HIV co-infection yields a robust predictive signature and generates hypotheses about the HIV+TB+ disease state," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0237534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.