IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0237184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formal Comment: Romer study fails at following core principles of reanalysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey A Bridge
  • Joel B Greenhouse
  • Kelly J Kelleher
  • John V Campo

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey A Bridge & Joel B Greenhouse & Kelly J Kelleher & John V Campo, 2020. "Formal Comment: Romer study fails at following core principles of reanalysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-3, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0237184
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237184
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237184&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0237184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Romer, 2020. "Reanalysis of the Bridge et al. study of suicide following release of 13 Reasons Why," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-7, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martí Guinovart & Jesús Cobo & Alexandre González-Rodríguez & Isabel Parra-Uribe & Diego Palao, 2023. "Towards the Influence of Media on Suicidality: A Systematic Review of Netflix’s ‘Thirteen Reasons Why’," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-25, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Romer, 2020. "Reanalysis of the effects of “13 Reasons Why”: Response to Bridge et al," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-3, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0237184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.