IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0236419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multidisciplinary care for opioid dose reduction in patients with chronic non-cancer pain: A systematic realist review

Author

Listed:
  • Abhimanyu Sud
  • Alana Armas
  • Heather Cunningham
  • Shawn Tracy
  • Kirk Foat
  • Navindra Persaud
  • Fardous Hosseiny
  • Sylvia Hyland
  • Leyna Lowe
  • Erin Zlahtic
  • Rhea Murti
  • Hannah Derue
  • Ilana Birnbaum
  • Katija Bonin
  • Ross Upshur
  • Michelle L A Nelson

Abstract

Context: Opioid related deaths are at epidemic levels in many developed nations globally. Concerns about the contribution of prescribed opioids, and particularly high-dose opioids, continue to mount as do initiatives to reduce prescribing. Evidence around opioid tapering, which can be challenging and potentially hazardous, is not well developed. A recent national guideline has recognized this and recommended referral to multidisciplinary care for challenging cases of opioid tapering. However, multidisciplinary care for opioid tapering is not well understood or defined. Objective: Identify the existing literature on any multidisciplinary care programs that evaluate impact on opioid use, synthesize how these programs work and clarify whom they benefit. Study design: Systematic rapid realist review. Dataset: Bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library), grey literature, reference hand search and formal expert consultation. Results: 95 studies were identified. 75% of the programs were from the United States and the majority (n = 62) were published after 2000. A minority (n = 23) of programs reported on >12 month opioid use outcomes. There were three necessary but insufficient mechanisms common to all programs: pain relief, behavior change and active medication management. Programs that did not include a combination of all three mechanisms did not result in opioid dose reductions. A concerning 20–40% of subjects resumed opioid use within one year of program completion. Conclusions: Providing alternative analgesia is insufficient for reducing opioid doses. Even high quality primary care multidisciplinary care programs do not reduce prescribed opioid use unless there is active medication management accomplished by changing the primary opioid prescriber. Rates of return to use of opioids from these programs are very concerning in the current context of a highly potent and lethal street drug supply. This contextual factor may be powerful enough to undermine the modest benefits of opioid dose reduction via multidisciplinary care.

Suggested Citation

  • Abhimanyu Sud & Alana Armas & Heather Cunningham & Shawn Tracy & Kirk Foat & Navindra Persaud & Fardous Hosseiny & Sylvia Hyland & Leyna Lowe & Erin Zlahtic & Rhea Murti & Hannah Derue & Ilana Birnbau, 2020. "Multidisciplinary care for opioid dose reduction in patients with chronic non-cancer pain: A systematic realist review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-31, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0236419
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236419
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236419&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0236419?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jessica Y. Ho, 2019. "The Contemporary American Drug Overdose Epidemic in International Perspective," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 45(1), pages 7-40, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gutin, Iliya & Copeland, William & Godwin, Jennifer & Mullan Harris, Kathleen & Shanahan, Lilly & Gaydosh, Lauren, 2023. "Defining despair: Assessing the multidimensionality of despair and its association with suicidality and substance use in early to middle adulthood," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    2. Samuel H. Preston & Yana C. Vierboom, 2021. "The Changing Age Distribution of the United States," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 47(2), pages 527-539, June.
    3. Janet Currie & Hannes Schwandt, 2020. "The Opioid Epidemic Was Not Primarily Caused by Economic Distress But by Other Factors that Can be More Readily Addressed," Working Papers 2020-25, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    4. Peter Congdon, 2019. "Geographical Patterns in Drug-Related Mortality and Suicide: Investigating Commonalities in English Small Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Janet Currie & Hannes Schwandt, 2021. "The Opioid Epidemic Was Not Caused by Economic Distress but by Factors That Could Be More Rapidly Addressed," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 695(1), pages 276-291, May.
    6. Stelson, Elisabeth A. & Sabbath-Clayton, Lauren L. & Sorensen, Glorian & Kubzansky, Laura D. & Berkman, Lisa F. & Sabbath, Erika L., 2022. "Residential addiction treatment providers: Identifying the role of social context in worker health and turnover," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    7. Jessica Y. Ho, 2020. "Cycles of Gender Convergence and Divergence in Drug Overdose Mortality," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 46(3), pages 443-470, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0236419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.