IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0236258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parkinson’s disease detection from 20-step walking tests using inertial sensors of a smartphone: Machine learning approach based on an observational case-control study

Author

Listed:
  • Milla Juutinen
  • Cassia Wang
  • Justin Zhu
  • Juan Haladjian
  • Jari Ruokolainen
  • Juha Puustinen
  • Antti Vehkaoja

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease inducing dystrophy of the motor system. Automatic movement analysis systems have potential in improving patient care by enabling personalized and more accurate adjust of treatment. These systems utilize machine learning to classify the movement properties based on the features derived from the signals. Smartphones can provide an inexpensive measurement platform with their built-in sensors for movement assessment. This study compared three feature selection and nine classification methods for identifying PD patients from control subjects based on accelerometer and gyroscope signals measured with a smartphone during a 20-step walking test. Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) and sequential feature selection with both forward (SFS) and backward (SBS) propagation directions were used in this study. The number of selected features was narrowed down from 201 to 4–15 features by applying SFS and mRMR methods. From the methods compared in this study, the highest accuracy for individual steps was achieved with SFS (7 features) and Naive Bayes classifier (accuracy 75.3%), and the second highest accuracy with SFS (4 features) and k Nearest neighbours (accuracy 75.1%). Leave-one-subject-out cross-validation was used in the analysis. For the overall classification of each subject, which was based on the majority vote of the classified steps, k Nearest Neighbors provided the most accurate result with an accuracy of 84.5% and an error rate of 15.5%. This study shows the differences in feature selection methods and classifiers and provides generalizations for optimizing methodologies for smartphone-based monitoring of PD patients. The results are promising for further developing the analysis system for longer measurements carried out in free-living conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Milla Juutinen & Cassia Wang & Justin Zhu & Juan Haladjian & Jari Ruokolainen & Juha Puustinen & Antti Vehkaoja, 2020. "Parkinson’s disease detection from 20-step walking tests using inertial sensors of a smartphone: Machine learning approach based on an observational case-control study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0236258
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236258
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236258&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0236258?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johannes C M Schlachetzki & Jens Barth & Franz Marxreiter & Julia Gossler & Zacharias Kohl & Samuel Reinfelder & Heiko Gassner & Kamiar Aminian & Bjoern M Eskofier & Jürgen Winkler & Jochen Klucken, 2017. "Wearable sensors objectively measure gait parameters in Parkinson’s disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Jochen Klucken & Jens Barth & Patrick Kugler & Johannes Schlachetzki & Thore Henze & Franz Marxreiter & Zacharias Kohl & Ralph Steidl & Joachim Hornegger & Bjoern Eskofier & Juergen Winkler, 2013. "Unbiased and Mobile Gait Analysis Detects Motor Impairment in Parkinson's Disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Patrícia Rocha & Hugo Miguel Pereira Choupina & Maria do Carmo Vilas-Boas & José Maria Fernandes & João Paulo Silva Cunha, 2018. "System for automatic gait analysis based on a single RGB-D camera," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Robert J Ellis & Yee Sien Ng & Shenggao Zhu & Dawn M Tan & Boyd Anderson & Gottfried Schlaug & Ye Wang, 2015. "A Validated Smartphone-Based Assessment of Gait and Gait Variability in Parkinson’s Disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Christiana Ossig & Florin Gandor & Mareike Fauser & Cecile Bosredon & Leonid Churilov & Heinz Reichmann & Malcolm K Horne & Georg Ebersbach & Alexander Storch, 2016. "Correlation of Quantitative Motor State Assessment Using a Kinetograph and Patient Diaries in Advanced PD: Data from an Observational Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0236258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.