IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0236182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative ultrasound radiomics for therapy response monitoring in patients with locally advanced breast cancer: Multi-institutional study results

Author

Listed:
  • Karina Quiaoit
  • Daniel DiCenzo
  • Kashuf Fatima
  • Divya Bhardwaj
  • Lakshmanan Sannachi
  • Mehrdad Gangeh
  • Ali Sadeghi-Naini
  • Archya Dasgupta
  • Michael C Kolios
  • Maureen Trudeau
  • Sonal Gandhi
  • Andrea Eisen
  • Frances Wright
  • Nicole Look-Hong
  • Arjun Sahgal
  • Greg Stanisz
  • Christine Brezden
  • Robert Dinniwell
  • William T Tran
  • Wei Yang
  • Belinda Curpen
  • Gregory J Czarnota

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). The study was conducted to investigate the utility of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) carried out during NAC to predict the final tumour response in a multi-institutional setting. Methods: Fifty-nine patients with LABC were enrolled from three institutions in North America (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Toronto, Canada), MD Anderson Cancer Centre (Texas, USA), and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto, Canada)). QUS data were collected before starting NAC and subsequently at weeks 1 and 4 during chemotherapy. Spectral tumour parametric maps were generated, and textural features determined using grey-level co-occurrence matrices. Patients were divided into two groups based on their pathological outcomes following surgery: responders and non-responders. Machine learning algorithms using Fisher’s linear discriminant (FLD), K-nearest neighbour (K-NN), and support vector machine (SVM-RBF) were used to generate response classification models. Results: Thirty-six patients were classified as responders and twenty-three as non-responders. Among all the models, SVM-RBF had the highest accuracy of 81% at both weeks 1 and week 4 with area under curve (AUC) values of 0.87 each. The inclusion of week 1 and 4 features led to an improvement of the classifier models, with the accuracy and AUC from baseline features only being 76% and 0.68, respectively. Conclusion: QUS data obtained during NAC reflect the ongoing treatment-related changes during chemotherapy and can lead to better classifier performances in predicting the ultimate pathologic response to treatment compared to baseline features alone.

Suggested Citation

  • Karina Quiaoit & Daniel DiCenzo & Kashuf Fatima & Divya Bhardwaj & Lakshmanan Sannachi & Mehrdad Gangeh & Ali Sadeghi-Naini & Archya Dasgupta & Michael C Kolios & Maureen Trudeau & Sonal Gandhi & Andr, 2020. "Quantitative ultrasound radiomics for therapy response monitoring in patients with locally advanced breast cancer: Multi-institutional study results," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0236182
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236182
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236182&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0236182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0236182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.