IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0235758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and validation of risk prediction models for multiple cardiovascular diseases and Type 2 diabetes

Author

Listed:
  • Mehrdad Rezaee
  • Igor Putrenko
  • Arsia Takeh
  • Andrea Ganna
  • Erik Ingelsson

Abstract

Accurate risk assessment of an individuals’ propensity to develop cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) is crucial for the prevention of these conditions. Numerous published risk prediction models used for CVD risk assessment are based on conventional risk factors and include only a limited number of biomarkers. The addition of novel biomarkers can boost the discriminative ability of risk prediction models for CVDs with different pathogenesis. The present study reports the development of risk prediction models for a range of heterogeneous CVDs, including coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), as well as for Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), a major CVD risk factor. In addition to conventional risk factors, the models incorporate various blood biomarkers and comorbidities to improve both individual and population stratification. An automatic variable selection approach was developed to generate the best set of explanatory variables for each model from the initial panel of risk factors. In total, up to 254,220 UK Biobank participants (ranging from 215,269 to 254,220 for different CVDs and DM2) were included in the analyses. The derived prediction models utilizing Cox proportional hazards regression achieved consistent discrimination performance (C-index) for all diseases: CAD, 0.794 (95% CI, 0.787–0.801); DM2, 0.909 (95% CI, 0.903–0.916); stroke, 0.778 (95% CI, 0.756–0.801); DVT, 0.743 (95% CI, 0.737–0.749); and AAA, 0.893 (95% CI, 0.874–0.912). When validated on various subpopulations, they demonstrated higher discrimination in healthier and middle-age individuals. In general, calibration of a five-year risk of developing the CVDs and DM2 demonstrated incremental overestimation of disease-related conditions amongst the highest decile of risk probabilities. In summary, the risk prediction models described were validated with high discrimination and good calibration for several CVDs and DM2. These models incorporate multiple shared predictor variables and may be integrated into a single platform to enhance clinical stratification to impact health outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehrdad Rezaee & Igor Putrenko & Arsia Takeh & Andrea Ganna & Erik Ingelsson, 2020. "Development and validation of risk prediction models for multiple cardiovascular diseases and Type 2 diabetes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0235758
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235758
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235758&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0235758?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jasmijn F Timp & Sigrid K Braekkan & Willem M Lijfering & Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg & John-Bjarne Hansen & Frits R Rosendaal & Saskia le Cessie & Suzanne C Cannegieter, 2019. "Prediction of recurrent venous thrombosis in all patients with a first venous thrombotic event: The Leiden Thrombosis Recurrence Risk Prediction model (L-TRRiP)," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-22, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0235758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.