IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0235496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between purchasing behaviors and cigar use: A longitudinal analysis of Waves 1-3 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica L King
  • Lingpeng Shan
  • Sunday Azagba

Abstract

Introduction: Over 120 US jurisdictions have implemented policies mandating minimum cigar pack quantities, yet little empirical research exists on the relationship between pack quantity and use. We examined whether cigar use was associated with purchasing cigars by the box/pack or as singles, purchase quantity, and price paid per cigar. Methods: Data are from Waves 1–3 (2013–2016) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, analyzed in 2019. The sample included adults who reported current use of any type of cigars (cigarillos [N = 3,051], traditional cigars [N = 2,586], and filtered cigars [N = 1,295], including with marijuana) at Wave 1. For each cigar type, a generalized estimating equation model was used to examine the population-averaged effects of purchasing behavior on cigar use. Results: Cigar users of each type who purchased by the box or pack smoked more per day than users who purchased singles (cigarillos: β = 1.02, p

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica L King & Lingpeng Shan & Sunday Azagba, 2020. "Association between purchasing behaviors and cigar use: A longitudinal analysis of Waves 1-3 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-10, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0235496
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235496
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235496&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0235496?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James P. Monahan, 1984. "A Quantity Discount Pricing Model to Increase Vendor Profits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 720-726, June.
    2. Lisa Farrell & Tim Fry & Mark Harris, 2011. "'A pack a day for 20 years': smoking and cigarette pack sizes," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(21), pages 2833-2842.
    3. Robert J. Dolan, 1987. "Quantity Discounts: Managerial Issues and Research Opportunities," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22.
    4. Kozlowski, L.T., 1986. "Pack size, reported cigarette smoking rates, and public health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 76(11), pages 1337-1338.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mutlu, Fatih & Çetinkaya, Sıla, 2020. "Supplier–carrier–buyer channels: Contractual pricing for a carrier serving a supplier–buyer partnership," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    2. Salma Karray & Chirag Surti, 2016. "Channel coordination with quantity discounts and/or cooperative advertising," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(17), pages 5317-5335, September.
    3. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Liu, Yu-Te & Wang, Wei-Ming, 2010. "Coordinating ordering and pricing decisions in a two-stage distribution system with price-sensitive demand through short-term discounting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 142-151, November.
    4. Kim, Young-Joo & Hwang, Hark, 2008. "Incremental discount policy for taxi fare with price-sensitive demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 895-902, April.
    5. Qinan Wang & Ruifang Wang, 2005. "Quantity discount pricing policies for heterogeneous retailers with price sensitive demand," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(7), pages 645-658, October.
    6. Gurnani, Haresh, 2001. "A study of quantity discount pricing models with different ordering structures: Order coordination, order consolidation, and multi-tier ordering hierarchy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 203-225, August.
    7. Viswanathan, S. & Wang, Qinan, 2003. "Discount pricing decisions in distribution channels with price-sensitive demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(3), pages 571-587, September.
    8. Webster, Scott & Kevin Weng, Z., 2008. "Ordering and pricing policies in a manufacturing and distribution supply chain for fashion products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 476-486, August.
    9. Shaban, Ibrahim Abdelfadeel & Chan, F.T.S. & Chung, S.H., 2021. "A novel model to manage air cargo disruptions caused by global catastrophes such as Covid-19," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. Yu-Jen Lin & Chia-Huei Ho, 2011. "Integrated inventory model with quantity discount and price-sensitive demand," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(1), pages 177-188, July.
    11. Mutlu, Fatih & Çetinkaya, Sıla, 2013. "Pricing decisions in a carrier–retailer channel under price-sensitive demand and contract-carriage with common-carriage option," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 28-40.
    12. Qinan Wang, 2004. "Coordinating independent buyers with integer‐ratio time coordination and quantity discounts," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(3), pages 316-331, April.
    13. Albert Y. Ha & Lode Li & Shu-Ming Ng, 2003. "Price and Delivery Logistics Competition in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(9), pages 1139-1153, September.
    14. Kevin Weng, Z., 1995. "Modeling quantity discounts under general price-sensitive demand functions: Optimal policies and relationships," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 300-314, October.
    15. Wang, Huihui & Yu, Yimin & Zhang, Wei & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2019. "Procurement strategies for lost-sales inventory systems with all-units discounts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 539-548.
    16. Foubert, Bram & Gijsbrechts, Els, 2010. "Please or Squeeze? Brand performance implications of constrained and unconstrained multi-item promotions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 880-892, May.
    17. Yang, Xiying & Hua, Guowei & Cheng, T.C.E. & Zhang, Li & Zhang, Yi & Xu, Yadong, 2022. "Buy two and get X% off: Quantity discount under consumers’ anticipated regret," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    18. Nihat Altintas & Feryal Erhun & Sridhar Tayur, 2008. "Quantity Discounts Under Demand Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 777-792, April.
    19. Li, Xiuhui & Wang, Qinan, 2007. "Coordination mechanisms of supply chain systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(1), pages 1-16, May.
    20. Joachim Marti & Jody Sindelar, 2015. "Smaller Cigarette Pack as a Commitment to Smoke Less? Insights from Behavioral Economics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0235496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.