Author
Listed:
- André Euler
- Katharina Martini
- Bettina Baessler
- Matthias Eberhard
- Friederike Schoeck
- Hatem Alkadhi
- Thomas Frauenfelder
Abstract
Objectives: To compare objective and subjective image quality of bronchial structures between a 512-pixel and a 1024-pixel image matrix for chest CT in phantoms and in patients. Materials and methods: First, a two-size chest phantom was imaged at two radiation doses on a 192-slice CT scanner. Datasets were reconstructed with 512-, 768-, and 1024-pixel image matrices and a sharp reconstruction kernel (Bl64). Image sharpness and normalized noise power spectrum (nNPS) were quantified. Second, chest CT images of 100 patients were reconstructed with 512- and 1024-pixel matrices and two blinded readers independently assessed objective and subjective image quality. In each patient dataset, the highest number of visible bronchi was counted for each lobe of the right lung. A linear mixed effects model was applied in the phantom study and a Welch’s t-test in the patient study. Results: Objective image sharpness and image noise increased with increasing matrix size and were highest for the 1024-matrix in phantoms and patients (all, P 0.07) and the overall bronchial image quality between the two matrices (P>0.22). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated superior image sharpness and higher image noise for a 1024- compared to a 512-pixel matrix, while there was no significant difference in the depiction and subjective image quality of bronchial structures for chest CT.
Suggested Citation
André Euler & Katharina Martini & Bettina Baessler & Matthias Eberhard & Friederike Schoeck & Hatem Alkadhi & Thomas Frauenfelder, 2020.
"1024-pixel image matrix for chest CT – Impact on image quality of bronchial structures in phantoms and patients,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0234644
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234644
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0234644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.