IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0234016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula

Author

Listed:
  • Weili Zhang
  • Qinying Huang
  • Yile Chen
  • Jinying Li

Abstract

Purpose: We propose a new method to calculate proptosis by using the simple Heron’s formula and analyze its feasibility. Method: It was a none-inferiority trial. The registration number was ChiCTR1900026490. The absolute value of proptosis in 120 eyes, 60 patients without eye injury or diseases, was measured by computed tomography (CT) and simple Heron’s formula. We did regression analysis and analyzed the differences between the two methods with Medcalc software version 19.0.4. The result was showed by Passing–Bablok regression analysis diagram and Bland and Altman plot. Results: The Passing-Bablok showed that the result of proptosis measured by CT and simple Heron’s formula showed good positive correlation. A 95% limit of agreement in proptosis between CT and Heron’s formula method was -0.46 to 0.54 mm in right eye and -0.45 to 0.46 mm in left eye. 1.66% (1/60) point was outside 95% LoA in both eyes. Moreover, a 95% limit of agreement between CT and Heron’s formula method was -0.42 to 0.56 mm in difference of both eyes. 3.33% (2/60) points were outside 95% LoA. The points in all Bland and Altman plots were lower than 5%. It means that the results of comparison between the two methods had a good consistency in the measurement of proptosis. Conclusions: Heron’s formula could be applied to calculate proptosis and has a good consistency compared with computed tomography (CT). This method is practical in proptosis assessment because of its accuracy, reliability and simplicity.

Suggested Citation

  • Weili Zhang & Qinying Huang & Yile Chen & Jinying Li, 2020. "The feasibility analysis of calculating proptosis by simple Heron’s formula," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-8, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0234016
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0234016
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0234016&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0234016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0234016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.