IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0233749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Catastrophic health expenditure: A comparative analysis of smoking and non-smoking households in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhigang Zhong
  • Han Wei
  • Lian Yang
  • Tingting Yao
  • Zhengzhong Mao
  • Qun Sun

Abstract

Introduction: Smoking is hazardous to health and places a heavy economic burden on individuals and their families. Clearly, smoking in China is prevalent since China is the largest consumer of tobacco in the world. Chinese smoking and nonsmoking households were compared in terms of the incidence and intensity of Catastrophic Health Expenditures (CHEs). The factors associated with catastrophic health expenditures were analyzed. Methods: Data for this study were collected from two waves of panel data in 2011 and 2013 from the national China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). A total of 8073 households with at least one member aged above 45 were identified each year. Catastrophic health expenditure was measured by the ratio of a household’s out-of-pocket healthcare payments (OOP) to the household’s Capacity to Pay (CTP). A panel logit random-effects model was used to examine correlates with catastrophic health expenditure. Results: The incidence of catastrophic health expenditures for Chinese households with members aged 45 and above in 2011 and 2013 were 12.99% and 15.56%, respectively. The mean gaps (MGs) were 3.16% and 4.88%, respectively, and the mean positive gaps (MPGs) were 24.36% and 31.40%, respectively. The incidences of catastrophic health expenditures were 17.41% and 20.03% in former smoking households, 12.10% and 15.09% in current smoking households, and 12.72% and 13.64% in nonsmoking households. In the panel logit regression model analysis, former smoking households (OR = 1.444, P

Suggested Citation

  • Zhigang Zhong & Han Wei & Lian Yang & Tingting Yao & Zhengzhong Mao & Qun Sun, 2020. "Catastrophic health expenditure: A comparative analysis of smoking and non-smoking households in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0233749
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0233749
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0233749&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0233749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0233749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.