IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0233338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of the Spanish version of the questionnaire on Patient Empowerment in Long-Term Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Paloma Garcimartín
  • Josep Comín-Colet
  • Yolanda Pardo-Cladellas
  • Neus Badosa
  • Anna Linas
  • Laia Rosenfeld
  • Merçe Faraudo
  • Oliver Valero
  • Encarna Hidalgo
  • Miguel Cainzos-Achirica
  • Sonia Ruiz
  • Pilar Delgado-Hito

Abstract

Background: Patient empowerment is a key factor in improving health outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the questionnaire on Patient Empowerment in Long-Term Conditions (PELC) that evaluates the degree of empowerment of patients with chronic diseases. Methods: Three measurements were made (at baseline, 2 weeks and 12 weeks) of quality of life (QoL), self-care, self-efficacy and empowerment. Reliability was evaluated as internal consistency for the entire sample. Test-retest reproducibility was evaluated for patients who were stable from baseline to week 2 (n = 70). Validity was analysed (n = 124) as baseline correlations with QoL, self-care, self-efficacy, clinical data and psychosocial variables. Sensitivity to change was analysed in terms of effect size for patients who had improved between baseline and week 12 (n = 48). Results: The study was carried out with 124 patients with a diagnosis of heart failure. Cronbach’s alpha was high, at >0.9, and the interclass correlation coefficient was low, at 0.47. PELC questionnaire scores showed differences depending on New York Heart Association functional class (p

Suggested Citation

  • Paloma Garcimartín & Josep Comín-Colet & Yolanda Pardo-Cladellas & Neus Badosa & Anna Linas & Laia Rosenfeld & Merçe Faraudo & Oliver Valero & Encarna Hidalgo & Miguel Cainzos-Achirica & Sonia Ruiz & , 2020. "Validation of the Spanish version of the questionnaire on Patient Empowerment in Long-Term Conditions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0233338
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0233338
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0233338&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0233338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0233338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.