IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0232450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spiracular fluttering increases oxygen uptake

Author

Listed:
  • Sean D Lawley
  • Michael C Reed
  • H Frederik Nijhout

Abstract

Many insects show discontinuous respiration with three phases, open, closed, and fluttering, in which the spiracles open and close rapidly. The relative durations of the three phases and the rate of fluttering during the flutter phase vary for individual insects depending on developmental stage and activity, vary between insects of the same species, and vary even more between different species. We studied how the rate of oxygen uptake during the flutter phase depends on the rate of fluttering. Using a mathematical model of oxygen diffusion in the insect tracheal system, we derive a formula for oxygen uptake during the flutter phase and how it depends on the length of the tracheal system, percentage of time open during the flutter phase, and the flutter rate. Surprisingly, our results show that an insect can have its spiracles closed a high percentage of time during the flutter phase and yet receive almost as much oxygen as if the spiracles were always open, provided the spiracles open and close rapidly. We investigate the respiratory gain due to fluttering for four specific insects. Our formula shows that respiratory gain increases with body size and with increased rate of fluttering. Therefore, insects can regulate their rate of oxygen uptake by varying the rate of fluttering while keeping the spiracles closed during a large fraction of the time during the flutter phase. We also use a mathematical model to show that water loss is approximately proportional to the percentage of time the spiracles are open. Thus, insects can achieve both high oxygen intake and low water loss by keeping the spiracles closed most of the time and fluttering while open, thereby decoupling the challenge of preventing water loss from the challenge of obtaining adequate oxygen uptake.

Suggested Citation

  • Sean D Lawley & Michael C Reed & H Frederik Nijhout, 2020. "Spiracular fluttering increases oxygen uptake," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0232450
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232450
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232450&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0232450?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. M. Simelane & S. Abelman & F. D. Duncan, 2014. "Dynamics of the Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, and Water Interaction across the Insect Spiracle," Abstract and Applied Analysis, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-11, September.
    2. Stefan K. Hetz & Timothy J. Bradley, 2005. "Insects breathe discontinuously to avoid oxygen toxicity," Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7025), pages 516-519, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rayanne Vitali & Claire M. Belcher & Jed O. Kaplan & Andrew J. Watson, 2022. "Increased fire activity under high atmospheric oxygen concentrations is compatible with the presence of forests," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0232450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.