IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0232141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of time frame binning for FDOPA uptake quantification in glioma

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine Girard
  • Hervé Saint-Jalmes
  • Nibras Chaboub
  • Pierre-Jean Le Reste
  • Alice Metais
  • Anne Devillers
  • Florence Le Jeune
  • Xavier Palard-Novello

Abstract

Introduction: 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]fluoro-L-phenylalanine (FDOPA) uptake quantification in glioma assessment can be distorted using a non-optimal time frame binning of time-activity curves (TAC). Under-sampling or over-sampling dynamic PET images induces significant variations on kinetic parameters quantification. We aimed to optimize temporal time frame binning for dynamic FDOPA PET imaging. Methods: Fourteen patients with 33 tumoral TAC with biopsy-proven gliomas were analysed. The mean SUVmax tumor-to-brain ratio (TBRmax) were compared at 20 min and 35 min post-injection (p.i). Five different time frame samplings within 20 min were compared: 11x10sec-6x15sec-5x20sec-3x300sec; 8x15sec– 2x30sec– 2x60sec– 3x300sec; 6x20sec– 8x60sec– 2x300sec; 10x30sec– 3x300sec and 4x45sec– 3x90sec– 5x150sec. The reversible single-tissue compartment model with blood volume parameter (VB) was selected using the Akaike information criterion. K1 values extracted from 1024 noisy simulated TAC using Monte Carlo method from the 5 different time samplings were compared to a target K1 value as the objective, which is the average of the K1 values extracted from the 33 lesions using an imaging-derived input function for each patient. Results: The mean TBRmax was significantly higher at 20 min p.i. than at 35 min p.i (respectively 1.4 +/- 0.8 and 1.2 +/- 0.6; p

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine Girard & Hervé Saint-Jalmes & Nibras Chaboub & Pierre-Jean Le Reste & Alice Metais & Anne Devillers & Florence Le Jeune & Xavier Palard-Novello, 2020. "Optimization of time frame binning for FDOPA uptake quantification in glioma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0232141
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232141
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232141&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0232141?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0232141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.