IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0231958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of intravenous dextrose on preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Chisaki Yokoyama
  • Takahiro Mihara
  • Shizuka Kashiwagi
  • Motokazu Koga
  • Takahisa Goto

Abstract

Background: It is reported that postoperative nausea and vomiting, common general anesthesia complications, may be prevented by perioperative intravenous dextrose administration, but with controversial clinical effectiveness. Objective: To evaluate perioperative intravenous dextrose for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis. Data sources: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, and the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry were searched from inception until 22 June 2019. Eligibility criteria: Trials investigating intravenous dextrose effects vs. placebos on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients who underwent general anesthesia. Results: Eleven trials (1,250 patients) were included. All participants were ASA1-2. The nine trials included laparoscopic surgeries, and 92.2% of the participants were women. The timing of dextrose infusion was before, during, and after surgery in three, five, and three trials, respectively. Our results revealed intravenous dextrose administration significantly reduced postoperative nausea, but not vomiting, during early and late postoperative periods (risk ratio [95% confidence interval], early nausea: 0.76 [0.59–0.99], late nausea: 0.65 [0.48–0.89]; early vomiting: 1.00 [0.81–1.25], late vomiting: 0.96 [0.43–2.16]). Evidence quality was downgraded to low because the trial sequential analysis indicated more trials are needed for firm conclusions. Conclusions: Compared with placebos, perioperative intravenous dextrose administration may decrease postoperative nausea but not vomiting. Trial registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: UMIN000030901).

Suggested Citation

  • Chisaki Yokoyama & Takahiro Mihara & Shizuka Kashiwagi & Motokazu Koga & Takahisa Goto, 2020. "Effects of intravenous dextrose on preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231958
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231958
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231958&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0231958?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayako Yokoi & Takahiro Mihara & Koui Ka & Takahisa Goto, 2017. "Comparative efficacy of ramosetron and ondansetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.