IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0231953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of triple-negative breast cancer cell lines classified under the same molecular subtype using different molecular characterization techniques: Implications for translational research

Author

Listed:
  • Jose Rodrigo Espinosa Fernandez
  • Bedrich L Eckhardt
  • Jangsoon Lee
  • Bora Lim
  • Troy Pearson
  • Rob S Seitz
  • David R Hout
  • Brock L Schweitzer
  • Tyler J Nielsen
  • O Rayne Lawrence
  • Ying Wang
  • Arvind Rao
  • Naoto T Ueno

Abstract

The original algorithm that classified triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) into six subtypes has recently been revised. The revised algorithm (TNBCtype-IM) classifies TNBC into five subtypes and a modifier based on immunological (IM) signatures. The molecular signature may differ between cancer cells in vitro and their respective tumor xenografts. We identified cell lines with concordant molecular subtypes regardless of classification algorithm or analysis of cells in vitro or in vivo, to establish a panel of clinically relevant molecularly stable TNBC models for translational research. Gene expression data were used to classify TNBC cell lines using the original and the revised algorithms. Tumor xenografts were established from 17 cell lines and subjected to gene expression profiling with the original 2188-gene algorithm TNBCtype and the revised 101-gene algorithm TNBCtype-IM. A total of six cell lines (SUM149PT (BL2), HCC1806 (BL2), SUM149PT (BL2), BT549 (M), MDA-MB-453 (LAR), and HCC2157 (BL1)) maintained their subtype classification between in vitro and tumor xenograft analyses across both algorithms. For TNBC molecular classification–guided translational research, we recommend using these TNBC cell lines with stable molecular subtypes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose Rodrigo Espinosa Fernandez & Bedrich L Eckhardt & Jangsoon Lee & Bora Lim & Troy Pearson & Rob S Seitz & David R Hout & Brock L Schweitzer & Tyler J Nielsen & O Rayne Lawrence & Ying Wang & Arvin, 2020. "Identification of triple-negative breast cancer cell lines classified under the same molecular subtype using different molecular characterization techniques: Implications for translational research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-8, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231953
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231953
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231953&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0231953?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.