IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0231011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No evidence for an association of plasma homocysteine levels and refractive error – Results from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS)

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Nickels
  • Henk J Blom
  • Andreas Schulz
  • Lutz Joachimsen
  • Thomas Münzel
  • Philipp S Wild
  • Manfred E Beutel
  • Maria Blettner
  • Karl J Lackner
  • Norbert Pfeiffer
  • Wolf A Lagrèze

Abstract

Purpose: There is a strong association between severe hyperhomocysteinemia and myopia. Thus we studied the hypothesis that even moderately increased levels of homocysteine (Hcy) might be a potentially treatable risk factor for myopia. Methods: The Gutenberg Health Study (GHS) is a population-based, prospective, observational cohort study in Germany, including 15,010 participants aged between 35 and 74 at recruitment. The baseline examination was conducted from 2007–2012. Refraction was measured using autorefraction (HARK 599, Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany). Hcy was measured by an immunoassay. We included only phakic participants without a history of corneal surgery or corneal laser treatment. We used linear regression models to evaluate the potential association between Hcy and refraction at baseline, and between Hcy and change in refraction between baseline and 5-year-follow-up examination. We used generalized estimating equation models to account for the correlation between fellow eyes. Results: We included 13,749 participants, categorized as having no myopia (spherical equivalent > -0.75 D, 65.2%), low myopia (-0.75 D–-2.75 D, 21.5%), moderate myopia (-3.00 D– 5.75 D, 9.8%) and high myopia (≤ -6 D, 3.5%). Median Hcy levels were similar in all groups (μmol/l). We observed no association of Hcy with refraction or 5-year change in refraction in the models adjusted for age, sex and socioeconomic status. Conclusion: We found no evidence for an association of Hcy levels and refractive error.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Nickels & Henk J Blom & Andreas Schulz & Lutz Joachimsen & Thomas Münzel & Philipp S Wild & Manfred E Beutel & Maria Blettner & Karl J Lackner & Norbert Pfeiffer & Wolf A Lagrèze, 2020. "No evidence for an association of plasma homocysteine levels and refractive error – Results from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-9, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231011
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231011&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0231011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.