IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0231000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards development of a statistical framework to evaluate myotonic dystrophy type 1 mRNA biomarkers in the context of a clinical trial

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Kurkiewicz
  • Anneli Cooper
  • Emily McIlwaine
  • Sarah A Cumming
  • Berit Adam
  • Ralf Krahe
  • Jack Puymirat
  • Benedikt Schoser
  • Lubov Timchenko
  • Tetsuo Ashizawa
  • Charles A Thornton
  • Simon Rogers
  • John D McClure
  • Darren G Monckton

Abstract

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a rare genetic disorder, characterised by muscular dystrophy, myotonia, and other symptoms. DM1 is caused by the expansion of a CTG repeat in the 3’-untranslated region of DMPK. Longer CTG expansions are associated with greater symptom severity and earlier age at onset. The primary mechanism of pathogenesis is thought to be mediated by a gain of function of the CUG-containing RNA, that leads to trans-dysregulation of RNA metabolism of many other genes. Specifically, the alternative splicing (AS) and alternative polyadenylation (APA) of many genes is known to be disrupted. In the context of clinical trials of emerging DM1 treatments, it is important to be able to objectively quantify treatment efficacy at the level of molecular biomarkers. We show how previously described candidate mRNA biomarkers can be used to model an effective reduction in CTG length, using modern high-dimensional statistics (machine learning), and a blood and muscle mRNA microarray dataset. We show how this model could be used to detect treatment effects in the context of a clinical trial.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Kurkiewicz & Anneli Cooper & Emily McIlwaine & Sarah A Cumming & Berit Adam & Ralf Krahe & Jack Puymirat & Benedikt Schoser & Lubov Timchenko & Tetsuo Ashizawa & Charles A Thornton & Simon Rogers, 2020. "Towards development of a statistical framework to evaluate myotonic dystrophy type 1 mRNA biomarkers in the context of a clinical trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231000
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231000
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231000&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0231000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.