IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0230901.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PET segmentation of bulky tumors: Strategies and workflows to improve inter-observer variability

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeth Pfaehler
  • Coreline Burggraaff
  • Gem Kramer
  • Josée Zijlstra
  • Otto S Hoekstra
  • Mathilde Jalving
  • Walter Noordzij
  • Adrienne H Brouwers
  • Marc G Stevenson
  • Johan de Jong
  • Ronald Boellaard

Abstract

Background: PET-based tumor delineation is an error prone and labor intensive part of image analysis. Especially for patients with advanced disease showing bulky tumor FDG load, segmentations are challenging. Reducing the amount of user-interaction in the segmentation might help to facilitate segmentation tasks especially when labeling bulky and complex tumors. Therefore, this study reports on segmentation workflows/strategies that may reduce the inter-observer variability for large tumors with complex shapes with different levels of user-interaction. Methods: Twenty PET images of bulky tumors were delineated independently by six observers using four strategies: (I) manual, (II) interactive threshold-based, (III) interactive threshold-based segmentation with the additional presentation of the PET-gradient image and (IV) the selection of the most reasonable result out of four established semi-automatic segmentation algorithms (Select-the-best approach). The segmentations were compared using Jaccard coefficients (JC) and percentage volume differences. To obtain a reference standard, a majority vote (MV) segmentation was calculated including all segmentations of experienced observers. Performed and MV segmentations were compared regarding positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity (SE), and percentage volume differences. Results: The results show that with decreasing user-interaction the inter-observer variability decreases. JC values and percentage volume differences of Select-the-best and a workflow including gradient information were significantly better than the measurements of the other segmentation strategies (p-value

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeth Pfaehler & Coreline Burggraaff & Gem Kramer & Josée Zijlstra & Otto S Hoekstra & Mathilde Jalving & Walter Noordzij & Adrienne H Brouwers & Marc G Stevenson & Johan de Jong & Ronald Boellaar, 2020. "PET segmentation of bulky tumors: Strategies and workflows to improve inter-observer variability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0230901
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230901
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230901&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0230901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0230901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.