IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0230534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individuals with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts have increased asymmetry of fingerprint patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine Neiswanger
  • Nandita Mukhopadhyay
  • Shwetha Rajagopalan
  • Elizabeth J Leslie
  • Carla A Sanchez
  • Jacqueline T Hecht
  • Iêda M Orioli
  • Fernando A Poletta
  • Javier Enríquez de Salamanca
  • Seth M Weinberg
  • Mary L Marazita

Abstract

Dermatoglyphic patterns on the fingers often differ in syndromes and other conditions with a developmental component, compared to the general population. Previous literature on the relationship between orofacial clefts–the most common craniofacial birth defect in humans–and dermatoglyphics is inconsistent, with some studies reporting altered pattern frequencies and/or increased asymmetry and others failing to find differences. To investigate dermatoglyphics in orofacial clefting, we obtained dermatoglyphic patterns in a large multiethnic cohort of orofacial cleft cases (N = 367), their unaffected family members (N = 836), and controls (N = 299). We categorized fingerprint pattern types from males and females who participated at five sites of the Pittsburgh Orofacial Cleft study (Hungary, United States of America (Pennsylvania, Texas), Spain, and Argentina). We also calculated a pattern dissimilarity score for each individual as a measure of left-right asymmetry. We tested for group differences in the number of arches, ulnar and radial loops, and whorls on each individual’s hands, and in the pattern dissimilarity scores using ANOVA. After taking sex and site differences into account, we did not find any significant pattern count differences between cleft and non-cleft individuals. Notably, we did observe increased pattern dissimilarity in individuals with clefts, compared to both their unaffected relatives and controls. Increased dermatoglyphic pattern dissimilarity in individuals with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts may reflect a generalized developmental instability.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine Neiswanger & Nandita Mukhopadhyay & Shwetha Rajagopalan & Elizabeth J Leslie & Carla A Sanchez & Jacqueline T Hecht & Iêda M Orioli & Fernando A Poletta & Javier Enríquez de Salamanca & Seth, 2020. "Individuals with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts have increased asymmetry of fingerprint patterns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0230534
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230534
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230534&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0230534?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0230534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.