IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0230438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating discharge communication for chronic disease patients in three hospitals in India

Author

Listed:
  • Claire Humphries
  • Suganthi Jaganathan
  • Jeemon Panniyammakal
  • Sanjeev Singh
  • Prabhakaran Dorairaj
  • Malcolm Price
  • Paramjit Gill
  • Sheila Greenfield
  • Richard Lilford
  • Semira Manaseki-Holland

Abstract

Objectives: Poor discharge communication is associated with negative health outcomes in high-income countries. However, quality of discharge communication has received little attention in India and many other low and middle-income countries. Primary objective: To investigate verbal and documented discharge communication for chronic non-communicable disease (NCD) patients. Secondary objective: To explore the relationship between quality of discharge communication and health outcomes. Methods: Design: Prospective study. Setting: Three public hospitals in Himachal Pradesh and Kerala states, India. Participants: 546 chronic NCD (chronic respiratory disease, cardiovascular disease or diabetes) patients. Piloted questionnaires were completed at admission, discharge and five and eighteen-week follow-up covering health status, discharge communication practices and health-seeking behaviour. Logistic regression was used to explore the relationship between quality of discharge communication and health outcomes. Outcome measures: Primary: Patient recall and experiences of verbal and documented discharge communication. Secondary: Death, hospital readmission and self-reported deterioration of NCD/s. Results: All patients received discharge notes, predominantly on sheets of paper with basic pre-printed headings (71%) or no structure (19%); 31% of notes contained all the following information required for facilitating continuity of care: diagnosis, medication information, lifestyle advice, and follow-up instructions. Patient reports indicated notable variations in verbal information provided during discharge consultations; 50% received ongoing treatment/management information and 23% received lifestyle advice. Within 18 weeks of follow-up, 25 (5%) patients had died, 69 (13%) had been readmitted and 62 (11%) reported that their chronic NCD/s had deteriorated. Significant associations were found between low-quality documented discharge communication and death (AOR = 3.00; 95% CI 1.27,7.06) and low-quality verbal discharge communication and self-reported deterioration of chronic NCD/s (AOR = 0.46; 95% CI 0.25,0.83) within 18-weeks of follow-up. Conclusions: Sub-optimal discharge practices may be compromising continuity and safety of chronic NCD patient care. Structured protocols, documents and training are required to improve discharge communication, healthcare integration and NCD management.

Suggested Citation

  • Claire Humphries & Suganthi Jaganathan & Jeemon Panniyammakal & Sanjeev Singh & Prabhakaran Dorairaj & Malcolm Price & Paramjit Gill & Sheila Greenfield & Richard Lilford & Semira Manaseki-Holland, 2020. "Investigating discharge communication for chronic disease patients in three hospitals in India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0230438
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230438
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230438&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0230438?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0230438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.