Author
Listed:
- Ruggiero Seccia
- Daniele Gammelli
- Fabio Dominici
- Silvia Romano
- Anna Chiara Landi
- Marco Salvetti
- Andrea Tacchella
- Andrea Zaccaria
- Andrea Crisanti
- Francesca Grassi
- Laura Palagi
Abstract
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) progresses at an unpredictable rate, but predictions on the disease course in each patient would be extremely useful to tailor therapy to the individual needs. We explore different machine learning (ML) approaches to predict whether a patient will shift from the initial Relapsing-Remitting (RR) to the Secondary Progressive (SP) form of the disease, using only “real world” data available in clinical routine. The clinical records of 1624 outpatients (207 in the SP phase) attending the MS service of Sant’Andrea hospital, Rome, Italy, were used. Predictions at 180, 360 or 720 days from the last visit were obtained considering either the data of the last available visit (Visit-Oriented setting), comparing four classical ML methods (Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbours and AdaBoost) or the whole clinical history of each patient (History-Oriented setting), using a Recurrent Neural Network model, specifically designed for historical data. Missing values were handled by removing either all clinical records presenting at least one missing parameter (Feature-saving approach) or the 3 clinical parameters which contained missing values (Record-saving approach). The performances of the classifiers were rated using common indicators, such as Recall (or Sensitivity) and Precision (or Positive predictive value). In the visit-oriented setting, the Record-saving approach yielded Recall values from 70% to 100%, but low Precision (5% to 10%), which however increased to 50% when considering only predictions for which the model returned a probability above a given “confidence threshold”. For the History-oriented setting, both indicators increased as prediction time lengthened, reaching values of 67% (Recall) and 42% (Precision) at 720 days. We show how “real world” data can be effectively used to forecast the evolution of MS, leading to high Recall values and propose innovative approaches to improve Precision towards clinically useful values.
Suggested Citation
Ruggiero Seccia & Daniele Gammelli & Fabio Dominici & Silvia Romano & Anna Chiara Landi & Marco Salvetti & Andrea Tacchella & Andrea Zaccaria & Andrea Crisanti & Francesca Grassi & Laura Palagi, 2020.
"Considering patient clinical history impacts performance of machine learning models in predicting course of multiple sclerosis,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, March.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0230219
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230219
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Yijun Zhao & Brian C Healy & Dalia Rotstein & Charles R G Guttmann & Rohit Bakshi & Howard L Weiner & Carla E Brodley & Tanuja Chitnis, 2017.
"Exploration of machine learning techniques in predicting multiple sclerosis disease course,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, April.
- Laura Palagi & Ruggiero Seccia, 2019.
"Online Block Layer Decomposition schemes for training Deep Neural Networks,"
DIAG Technical Reports
2019-06, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0230219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.