IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0230179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Football-specific validity of TRACAB’s optical video tracking systems

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Linke
  • Daniel Link
  • Martin Lames

Abstract

The present study aimed to validate and compare the football-specific measurement accuracy of two optical tracking systems engineered by TRACAB. The “Gen4” system consists of two multi-camera units (a stereo pair) in two locations either side of the halfway line, whereas the distributed “Gen5” system combines two stereo pairs on each side of the field as well as two monocular systems behind the goal areas. Data were collected from 20 male football players in two different exercises (a football sport-specific running course and small-sided games) in a professional football stadium. For evaluating the accuracy of the systems, measures were compared against simultaneously recorded measures of a reference system (VICON motion capture system). Statistical analysis uses RMSE for kinematic variables (position, speed and acceleration) and the difference in percentages for performance indicators (e.g. distance covered, peak speed) per run compared to the reference system. Frames in which players were obviously not tracked were excluded. Gen5 had marginally better accuracy (0.08 m RMSE) for position measurements than Gen4 (0.09 m RMSE) compared to the reference. Accuracy difference in instantaneous speed (Gen4: 0.09 m⋅s-1 RMSE; Gen5: 0.08 m⋅s-1 RMSE) and acceleration (Gen4: 0.26 m⋅s-2 RMSE; Gen5: 0.21 m⋅s-2 RMSE) measurements were significant, but also trivial in terms of the effect size. For total distance travelled, both Gen4 (0.42 ± 0.60%) and Gen5 (0.27 ± 0.35%) showed only trivial deviations compared to the reference. Gen4 showed moderate differences in the low-speed distance travelled category (-19.41 ± 13.24%) and small differences in the high-speed distance travelled category (8.94 ± 9.49%). Differences in peak speed, acceleration and deceleration were trivial (

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Linke & Daniel Link & Martin Lames, 2020. "Football-specific validity of TRACAB’s optical video tracking systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0230179
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230179
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230179&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0230179?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Link & Steffen Lang & Philipp Seidenschwarz, 2016. "Real Time Quantification of Dangerousity in Football Using Spatiotemporal Tracking Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valerio Ficcadenti & Roy Cerqueti & Ciro Hosseini Varde’i, 2023. "A rank-size approach to analyse soccer competitions and teams: the case of the Italian football league “Serie A"," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(1), pages 85-113, June.
    2. Bruno Gonçalves & Diogo Coutinho & Juliana Exel & Bruno Travassos & Carlos Lago & Jaime Sampaio, 2019. "Extracting spatial-temporal features that describe a team match demands when considering the effects of the quality of opposition in elite football," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Stijn Baert & Simon Amez, 2018. "No better moment to score a goal than just before half time? A soccer myth statistically tested," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Plattfaut, Ralf & Koch, Julian, 2021. "Preserving the legacy – Why do professional soccer clubs (not) adopt innovative process technologies? A grounded theory study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 237-250.
    5. Yurko Ronald & Matano Francesca & Richardson Lee F. & Granered Nicholas & Pospisil Taylor & Pelechrinis Konstantinos & Ventura Samuel L., 2020. "Going deep: models for continuous-time within-play valuation of game outcomes in American football with tracking data," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 163-182, June.
    6. Ali Cakmak & Ali Uzun & Emrullah Delibas, 2018. "Computational Modeling Of Pass Effectiveness In Soccer," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(03n04), pages 1-28, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0230179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.