Author
Listed:
- Felix Lakomek
- Roman-Patrik Lukas
- Peter Brinkrolf
- Andreas Mennewisch
- Nicole Steinsiek
- Peter Gutendorf
- Hendrik Sudowe
- Michael Heller
- Robert Kwiecien
- Alexander Zarbock
- Andreas Bohn
Abstract
Background: Current guidelines underline the importance of high-quality chest compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), to improve outcomes. Contrary to this many studies show that chest compression is often carried out poorly in clinical practice, and long interruptions in compression are observed. This prospective cohort study aimed to analyse whether chest compression quality changes when a real-time feedback system is used to provide simultaneous audiovisual feedback on chest compression quality. For this purpose, pauses in compression, compression frequency and compression depth were compared. Methods: The study included 292 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in three consecutive study groups: first group, conventional resuscitation (no-sensor CPR); second group, using a feedback sensor to collect compression depth data without real-time feedback (sensor-only CPR); and third group, with real-time feedback on compression quality (sensor-feedback CPR). Pauses and frequency were analysed using compression artefacts on electrocardiography, and compression depth was measured using the feedback sensor. With this data, various parameters were determined in order to be able to compare the chest compression quality between the three consecutive groups. Results: The compression fraction increased with sensor-only CPR (group 2) in comparison with no-sensor CPR (group 1) (80.1% vs. 87.49%; P
Suggested Citation
Felix Lakomek & Roman-Patrik Lukas & Peter Brinkrolf & Andreas Mennewisch & Nicole Steinsiek & Peter Gutendorf & Hendrik Sudowe & Michael Heller & Robert Kwiecien & Alexander Zarbock & Andreas Bohn, 2020.
"Real-time feedback improves chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective cohort study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0229431
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229431
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0229431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.