IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0228446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of machine learning into clinical breast MRI: Potential for objective and accurate decision-making in suspicious breast masses

Author

Listed:
  • Stephan Ellmann
  • Evelyn Wenkel
  • Matthias Dietzel
  • Christian Bielowski
  • Sulaiman Vesal
  • Andreas Maier
  • Matthias Hammon
  • Rolf Janka
  • Peter A Fasching
  • Matthias W Beckmann
  • Rüdiger Schulz Wendtland
  • Michael Uder
  • Tobias Bäuerle

Abstract

We investigated whether the integration of machine learning (ML) into MRI interpretation can provide accurate decision rules for the management of suspicious breast masses. A total of 173 consecutive patients with suspicious breast masses upon complementary assessment (BI-RADS IV/V: n = 100/76) received standardized breast MRI prior to histological verification. MRI findings were independently assessed by two observers (R1/R2: 5 years of experience/no experience in breast MRI) using six (semi-)quantitative imaging parameters. Interobserver variability was studied by ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient). A polynomial kernel function support vector machine was trained to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions based on the six imaging parameters and patient age. Ten-fold cross-validation was applied to prevent overfitting. Overall diagnostic accuracy and decision rules (rule-out criteria) to accurately exclude malignancy were evaluated. Results were integrated into a web application and published online. Malignant lesions were present in 107 patients (60.8%). Imaging features showed excellent interobserver variability (ICC: 0.81–0.98) with variable diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.65–0.82). Overall performance of the ML algorithm was high (AUC = 90.1%; BI-RADS IV: AUC = 91.6%). The ML algorithm provided decision rules to accurately rule-out malignancy with a false negative rate

Suggested Citation

  • Stephan Ellmann & Evelyn Wenkel & Matthias Dietzel & Christian Bielowski & Sulaiman Vesal & Andreas Maier & Matthias Hammon & Rolf Janka & Peter A Fasching & Matthias W Beckmann & Rüdiger Schulz Wendt, 2020. "Implementation of machine learning into clinical breast MRI: Potential for objective and accurate decision-making in suspicious breast masses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0228446
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228446
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228446&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0228446?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbara Bennani-Baiti & Nabila Bennani-Baiti & Pascal A Baltzer, 2016. "Diagnostic Performance of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Calcified Equivocal Breast Findings: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M Wielema & M D Dorrius & R M Pijnappel & G H De Bock & P A T Baltzer & M Oudkerk & P E Sijens, 2020. "Diagnostic performance of breast tumor tissue selection in diffusion weighted imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Giulia Bicchierai & Federica Di Naro & Diego De Benedetto & Diletta Cozzi & Silvia Pradella & Vittorio Miele & Jacopo Nori, 2021. "A Review of Breast Imaging for Timely Diagnosis of Disease," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-16, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0228446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.