IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0227846.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Running with cancer”: A qualitative study to evaluate barriers and motivations in running for female oncological patients

Author

Listed:
  • Alice Avancini
  • Kristina Skroce
  • Daniela Tregnago
  • Paolo Frada
  • Ilaria Trestini
  • Maria Cecilia Cercato
  • Clelia Bonaiuto
  • Cantor Tarperi
  • Federico Schena
  • Michele Milella
  • Sara Pilotto
  • Massimo Lanza

Abstract

Nowadays, it is widely acknowledged that low physical activity levels are associated with an increase in terms of both disease recurrence and mortality in cancer survivors. In this light, deciphering those factors able to hamper or facilitate an active lifestyle is crucial in order to increase patients’ adherence to physical activity. The purpose of this study was to explore barriers and motivations in a sample of female oncological patients, practising running using the ecological model and compare them with healthy controls. Focus group interviews were conducted at Verona University. Participants were 12 female cancer survivors and 7 matched healthy controls who had participated at “Run for Science” project. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using content analysis. Transcripts were categorized according to the ecological model, identifying barriers and motivations as themes. About motivations, three sub-themes were included: personal, interpersonal and environmental/organizational factors. Regarding barriers, another sub-theme was recognized: community/policy factors. Compared to healthy controls, survivors expressed motivations and barriers specifically related to their oncological disease. Running was a challenge with their cancer and a hope to give to other patients. Main barriers were represented by treatment-related side effects, inexperienced trainers and external factors, e.g. delivery of incorrect information. Running programs dedicated to oncological patients should consider intrinsic obstacles, related to cancer and its treatment. The interventions should offer a personalized program performed by qualified trainers, together with a motivational approach able to improve participants’ adherence to an active lifestyle.

Suggested Citation

  • Alice Avancini & Kristina Skroce & Daniela Tregnago & Paolo Frada & Ilaria Trestini & Maria Cecilia Cercato & Clelia Bonaiuto & Cantor Tarperi & Federico Schena & Michele Milella & Sara Pilotto & Mass, 2020. "“Running with cancer”: A qualitative study to evaluate barriers and motivations in running for female oncological patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0227846
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227846
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227846&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0227846?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Marie Lunde Husebø & Bjørg Karlsen & Helen Allan & Jon Arne Søreide & Edvin Bru, 2015. "Factors perceived to influence exercise adherence in women with breast cancer participating in an exercise programme during adjuvant chemotherapy: a focus group study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 500-510, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0227846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.