IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0227358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis in non-viral liver diseases using acoustic radiation force impulse elastography: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yuanqiang Lin
  • Hequn Li
  • Chunxiang Jin
  • Hui Wang
  • Bo Jiang

Abstract

Background: Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging is an ultrasound-based elastography method that has been studied in the staging of hepatic fibrosis, especially in chronic hepatitis. However, the diagnostic accuracy of ARFI in non-viral hepatopathies, such as autoimmune hepatitis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, has not been systematically determined. Aim: To systematically assess the diagnostic accuracy of ARFI in non-viral hepatopathies. Methods: The databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched for candidate studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of ARFI for hepatic fibrosis. The pooled estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated with the summary receiver operating curve (sROC) performed using STATA software. Results: In detail, a total of 29 diagnostic studies were included for further analysis. The quality of the included studies was relatively high using QUADAS method. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.79 (0.73, 0.83) and 0.81 (0.75, 0.86), with AUROC 0.87 (0.83, 0.89) for the staging of significant fibrosis (F≥2). Meanwhile, for the staging of severe fibrosis (F≥3), the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (0.87, 0.95) and 0.85 (0.80, 0.89), with AUROC 0.94 (0.92, 0.96). Furthermore, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.89 (0.79, 0.95) and 0.89 (0.85, 0.92), with AUROC 0.94 (0.92, 0.96) for ARFI in staging cirrhosis (F = 4), which were similar to the data for severe fibrosis. No significant publication bias was present in this study. Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated that ARFI exerted satisfactory diagnostic performance in staging non-viral hepatic fibrosis, especially severe fibrosis (F≥3) and cirrhosis (F = 4).

Suggested Citation

  • Yuanqiang Lin & Hequn Li & Chunxiang Jin & Hui Wang & Bo Jiang, 2020. "The diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis in non-viral liver diseases using acoustic radiation force impulse elastography: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0227358
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227358
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227358&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0227358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haixia Liu & Jing Fu & Ruixia Hong & Li Liu & Fang Li, 2015. "Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography for the Non-Invasive Evaluation of Hepatic Fibrosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-10, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Viera Kupčová & Michaela Fedelešová & Jozef Bulas & Petra Kozmonová & Ladislav Turecký, 2019. "Overview of the Pathogenesis, Genetic, and Non-Invasive Clinical, Biochemical, and Scoring Methods in the Assessment of NAFLD," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-25, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0227358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.