IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0226349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in receipt of opioid agonist treatment and time to enter treatment for opioid use disorder among specialty addiction programs in the United States, 2014-17

Author

Listed:
  • Justin C Yang
  • Andres Roman-Urrestarazu
  • Carol Brayne

Abstract

Background: Access to adequate treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) has been a high priority among American policymakers. Elucidation of the sociodemographic and institutional differences associated with the use, or lack thereof, of opioid agonist therapy (OAT) provides greater clarity on who receives OAT. Timely access to care is a further consideration and bears scrutiny as well. Methods: We draw upon data from the Treatment Episode Data Set—Admissions (TEDS-A) to analyse the relationship between sociodemographic and institutional characteristics and the receipt of opioid agonist treatments and time waiting to enter treatment. Results: Estimates from logistic regression models highlight certain groups which show lower odds of receipt of OAT, including those in precarious housing arrangements, those unemployed or not otherwise in the labor force, and those referred by drug abuse care providers, educational institutions, employers, and the criminal justice system. Groups which showed higher odds of waiting over a week to enter treatment included those who were separated, divorced, or widowed, those working part-time, and those referred by drug abuse care providers, employers, and the criminal justice system. Conclusion: Given the efficacy of OAT and the adverse outcomes associated with long waiting times, coordinated effort is needed to understand why these differences persist and how they may be addressed through appropriate policy responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Justin C Yang & Andres Roman-Urrestarazu & Carol Brayne, 2019. "Differences in receipt of opioid agonist treatment and time to enter treatment for opioid use disorder among specialty addiction programs in the United States, 2014-17," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0226349
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0226349
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0226349&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0226349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. King, N.B. & Fraser, V. & Boikos, C. & Richardson, R. & Harper, S., 2014. "Determinants of increased opioid-related mortality in the united states and canada, 1990-2013: A systematic review," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(8), pages 32-42.
    2. Justin Christopher Yang & Andres Roman-Urrestarazu & Carol Brayne, 2018. "Binge alcohol and substance use across birth cohorts and the global financial crisis in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sucharita Gopal & Manfred M. Fischer, 2023. "Opioid mortality in the US: quantifying the direct and indirect impact of sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Fiona Webster & Kathleen Rice & Joel Katz & Onil Bhattacharyya & Craig Dale & Ross Upshur, 2019. "An ethnography of chronic pain management in primary care: The social organization of physicians’ work in the midst of the opioid crisis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Anna Persmark & Maria Wemrell & Sofia Zettermark & George Leckie & S V Subramanian & Juan Merlo, 2019. "Precision public health: Mapping socioeconomic disparities in opioid dispensations at Swedish pharmacies by Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Lucas Marín Llanes & Hernando Zuleta, 2022. "Myths of drug consumption decriminalization: effects of Portuguese decriminalization on violent and drug use mortality," Documentos CEDE 20328, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    5. Jessica Neicun & Justin Christopher Yang & Hueyjong Shih & Pranay Nadella & Robin van Kessel & Attilio Negri & Kasia Czabanowska & Carol Brayne & Andres Roman-Urrestarazu, 2020. "Lifetime prevalence of novel psychoactive substances use among adults in the USA: Sociodemographic, mental health and illicit drug use correlates. Evidence from a population-based survey 2007–2014," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Ibrahima Bocoum & Aurelas B. Tohon & Roger Rukundo & Catherine Macombe & Jean-Pierre Revéret, 2019. "Effect of Income Inequality on Health in Quebec: New Insights from Panel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Benjamin R. Brady & Ehmer A. Taj & Elena Cameron & Aaron M. Yoder & Jennifer S. De La Rosa, 2023. "A Diagram of the Social-Ecological Conditions of Opioid Misuse and Overdose," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(20), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Vinícius Serafini Roglio & Eduardo Nunes Borges & Francisco Diego Rabelo-da-Ponte & Felipe Ornell & Juliana Nichterwitz Scherer & Jaqueline Bohrer Schuch & Ives Cavalcante Passos & Breno Sanvicente-Vi, 2020. "Prediction of attempted suicide in men and women with crack-cocaine use disorder in Brazil," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Bardwell, Geoff & Small, Will & Lavalley, Jennifer & McNeil, Ryan & Kerr, Thomas, 2021. "“People need them or else they're going to take fentanyl and die”: A qualitative study examining the ‘problem’ of prescription opioid diversion during an overdose epidemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    10. David R Just, 2023. "On the policy relevance of agricultural economics," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(4), pages 1256-1276.
    11. Pandey, Sujita & Hajizadeh, Mohammad & Kiadaliri, Ali, 2024. "The contributions of avoidable causes of death to gender gap in life expectancy and life disparity in the US and Canada: 2001–2019," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 347(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0226349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.