IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0226256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of different classification algorithms for protein sequence-based reverse vaccinology prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Ashley I Heinson
  • Rob M Ewing
  • John W Holloway
  • Christopher H Woelk
  • Mahesan Niranjan

Abstract

Previous work has shown that proteins that have the potential to be vaccine candidates can be predicted from features derived from their amino acid sequences. In this work, we make an empirical comparison across various machine learning classifiers on this sequence-based inference problem. Using systematic cross validation on a dataset of 200 known vaccine candidates and 200 negative examples, with a set of 525 features derived from the AA sequences and feature selection applied through a greedy backward elimination approach, we show that simple classification algorithms often perform as well as more complex support vector kernel machines. The work also includes a novel cross validation applied across bacterial species, i.e. the validation proteins all come from a specific species of bacterium not represented in the training set. We termed this type of validation Leave One Bacteria Out Validation (LOBOV).

Suggested Citation

  • Ashley I Heinson & Rob M Ewing & John W Holloway & Christopher H Woelk & Mahesan Niranjan, 2019. "An evaluation of different classification algorithms for protein sequence-based reverse vaccinology prediction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0226256
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0226256
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0226256&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0226256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruikun Cai & Zexian Liu & Jian Ren & Chuang Ma & Tianshun Gao & Yanhong Zhou & Qing Yang & Yu Xue, 2012. "GPS-MBA: Computational Analysis of MHC Class II Epitopes in Type 1 Diabetes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-9, March.
    2. Zexian Liu & Jun Cao & Xinjiao Gao & Qian Ma & Jian Ren & Yu Xue, 2011. "GPS-CCD: A Novel Computational Program for the Prediction of Calpain Cleavage Sites," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-7, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Serkan Varol & Serkan Catma & Diana Reindl & Elizabeth Serieux, 2022. "Primary Factors Influencing the Decision to Vaccinate against COVID-19 in the United States: A Pre-Vaccine Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bi-Qing Li & Yu-Dong Cai & Kai-Yan Feng & Gui-Jun Zhao, 2012. "Prediction of Protein Cleavage Site with Feature Selection by Random Forest," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-9, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0226256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.