Author
Listed:
- Simona Serrati
- Chiara Martinelli
- Antonio Palazzo
- Rosa Maria Iacobazzi
- Mara Perrone
- Quy K Ong
- Zhi Luo
- Ahmet Bekdemir
- Giulia Pinto
- Ornella Cavalleri
- Annalisa Cutrignelli
- Valentino Laquintana
- Nunzio Denora
- Francesco Stellacci
- Silke Krol
Abstract
Reproducibility of results is essential for a well-designed and conducted experiment. Several reasons may originate failure in reproducing data, such as selective reporting, low statistical power, or poor analysis. In this study, we used PEG6000 samples from different distributors and tested their capability inducing spheroid formation upon surface coating. MALDI-MS, NMR, FTIR, and Triple SEC analysis of the different PEG60000s showed nearly identical physicochemical properties different, with only minor differences in mass and hydrodynamic radius, and AFM analysis showed no significant differences in the surface coatings obtained with the available PEG6000s. Despite these similarities, just one showed a highly reproducible formation of spheroids with different cell lines, such as HT-29, HeLa, Caco2, and PANC-1. Using the peculiar PEG6000 sample and a reference PEG6000 chosen amongst the others as control, we tested the effect of the cell/PEG interaction by incubating cells in the PEG solution prior to cell plating. These experiments indicate that the spheroid formation is due to direct interaction of the polymer with the cells rather than by interaction of cells with the coated surfaces. The experiments point out that for biological entities, such as cells or tissues, even very small differences in impurities or minimal variations in the starting product can have a very strong impact on the reproducibility of data.
Suggested Citation
Simona Serrati & Chiara Martinelli & Antonio Palazzo & Rosa Maria Iacobazzi & Mara Perrone & Quy K Ong & Zhi Luo & Ahmet Bekdemir & Giulia Pinto & Ornella Cavalleri & Annalisa Cutrignelli & Valentino , 2020.
"Reproducibility warning: The curious case of polyethylene glycol 6000 and spheroid cell culture,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, March.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0224002
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224002
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0224002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.