IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0221504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of adoption of a new urate-lowering agent on trends in utilization and cost in practice

Author

Listed:
  • Yueh-Lung Peng
  • Chien-Te Lee
  • You-Lin Tain
  • Yaw-Bin Huang
  • Hung-Yi Chuang
  • Yen-Hsia Wen
  • Shiou-Huei Huang
  • Chun-Yu Tsai
  • Chien-Ning Hsu

Abstract

Objectives: Changes in treatment choice of therapy and size of treated population that can lead to under- or overestimate of payer’s budget are less likely to be reassured after reimbursement adoption of a new drug. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of febuxostat introduction and the modifications in its insurance coverage on the utilization and expenditure of urate-lowering therapy (ULT). Methods: Electronic medical records for adults patients prescribed any ULT during 2010–2015 was derived from the largest medical organization in Taiwan. Aggregated estimates of ULT use and costs were assessed per 3-month and per patient per month (PPPM). Factors associated with total ULT expenditure were assessed using a time series design with factored Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models. Results: ULT prevalent users increased 34.1% from 2010 to 2015 and a 123% increase in total ULT expenditure. Numbers on allopurinol and sulfinpyrazone both declined 31%, and on benzbromarone and febuxostat gradually increased to 38.21% and 22.89% of all users in 2015. Insurance payments PPPM ($4.44 to $9.22) and total monthly ULT cost ($32,946 to $ 85,732) growth more than doubled in 6 years, trend changes generated mostly by individuals switching to febuxostat. Conclusions: ULT use moved to favor benzbromarone and febuxostat; greater expensive uptake for febuxostat led to a rapid rise in ULT cost. Marginal values of increasing access to febuxostat for asymptomatic hyperuricemia should be focus on future studies to facilitate drug prices negotiation and ensure appropriate ULT use.

Suggested Citation

  • Yueh-Lung Peng & Chien-Te Lee & You-Lin Tain & Yaw-Bin Huang & Hung-Yi Chuang & Yen-Hsia Wen & Shiou-Huei Huang & Chun-Yu Tsai & Chien-Ning Hsu, 2019. "The impact of adoption of a new urate-lowering agent on trends in utilization and cost in practice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0221504
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0221504
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0221504&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0221504?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Nuijten & T. Mittendorf & U. Persson, 2011. "Practical issues in handling data input and uncertainty in a budget impact analysis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 12(3), pages 231-241, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Kuhlmann & Anne Prenzler & Jan Hacker & J-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg, 2013. "Impact of radiofrequency ablation for patients with varicose veins on the budget of the German statutory health insurance system," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Eman Mohammad Massad & Amir Bakir, 2021. "A Framework for Developing a Model Structure of Budget Impact Analysis for New Health Care Interventions in Jordan," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 126-134.
    3. Livio Garattini & Katelijne Vooren, 2011. "Budget impact analysis in economic evaluation: a proposal for a clearer definition," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 12(6), pages 499-502, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0221504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.