IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0221196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Retrospective evaluation of clinical use of cis-atracurium in horses

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandru Tutunaru
  • Julien Dupont
  • Alexandra Gougnard
  • Keila Ida
  • Didier Serteyn
  • Charlotte Sandersen

Abstract

Background: To the authors’ knowledge, there are no reports describing the use of cis-atracurium in the horse. Objective: To describe the onset time and the duration of the neuromuscular blockade (NMB) of three different doses of cis-atracurium in horses and to determine the appropriate dose needed maintain a NMB. Study design: Retrospective study. Methods: Horses which received cis-atracurium as part of a balanced anaesthetic protocol at the Equine Teaching Hospital of the University of Liège between March 2014 and June 2017 were included in this study. A train-of-four (TOF) stimulation pattern was used to assess the NMB. The cis-atracurium induction dose, the onset and duration of action (when TOF count was under three twitches) of the first bolus, the number of supplementary boluses of cis-atracurium and the total dose of cis-atracurium administered per horse, the total duration of the NMB and the recovery time were recorded and analysed. Also the use of an antidote and any side effects produced by cis-atracurium were recorded. Results: From 37 horses that received cis-atracurium during this period, only 23 had a complete records and were included in the study. Three different doses of cis-atracurium were used to induce NMB: 100 μg/kg (n = 8) 75 μg/kg (n = 3) and 50 μg/kg (n = 12). Cis-atracurium 50 μg/kg failed to induce NMB in 3 horses. The onset of action was not significantly different between the three doses (5 minutes). The duration of the NMB was dose-dependent. The calculated dose of cis-atracurium necessary to maintain a NMB was 2.3 μg/kg/minute based on the sum of the induction dose and the supplementary boluses divided by the duration of the NMB. Main limitations: A further prospective study is needed to confirm the results. Conclusions: Cis-atracurium can be an alternative to other NMBA in horses.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandru Tutunaru & Julien Dupont & Alexandra Gougnard & Keila Ida & Didier Serteyn & Charlotte Sandersen, 2019. "Retrospective evaluation of clinical use of cis-atracurium in horses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-8, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0221196
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0221196
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0221196&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0221196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0221196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.