IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0220190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement reproducibility of slice-interleaved T1 and T2 mapping sequences over 20 months: A single center study

Author

Listed:
  • Jihye Jang
  • Long H Ngo
  • Gabriella Captur
  • James C Moon
  • Reza Nezafat

Abstract

Background: Quantifying reproducibility of native T1 and T2 mapping over a long period (> 1 year) is necessary to assess whether changes in T1 and T2 over repeated sessions in a longitudinal study are associated with variability due to underlying tissue composition or technical confounders. Objectives: To carry out a single-center phantom study to 1) investigate measurement reproducibility of slice-interleaved T1 (STONE) and T2 mapping over 20 months, 2) quantify sources of variability, and 3) compare reproducibility and measurements against reference spin-echo measurements. Methods: MR imaging was performed on a 1.5 Tesla Philips Achieva scanner every 2–3 weeks over 20 months using the T1MES phantom. In each session, slice-interleaved T1 and T2 mapping was repeated 3 times for 5 slices, and maps were reconstructed using both 2-parameter and 3-parameter fit models. Reproducibility between sessions, and repeatability between repetitions and slices were evaluated using coefficients of variation (CV). Different sources of variability were quantified using variance decomposition analysis. The slice-interleaved measurement was compared to the spin-echo reference and MOLLI. Results: Slice-interleaved T1 had excellent reproducibility and repeatability with a CV

Suggested Citation

  • Jihye Jang & Long H Ngo & Gabriella Captur & James C Moon & Reza Nezafat, 2019. "Measurement reproducibility of slice-interleaved T1 and T2 mapping sequences over 20 months: A single center study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0220190
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220190
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220190&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0220190?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0220190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.