IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0220147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simplifying models and estimating grasp performance for comparing dynamic hand orthosis concepts

Author

Listed:
  • Ronald A Bos
  • Dick H Plettenburg
  • Just L Herder

Abstract

While designing a dynamic hand orthosis to assist during activities of daily living, the designer has to know whether a concept will have sufficient grasp performance to support these activities. This is often estimated by measuring the interaction force at the contact interface. However, this requires a prototyping step and limits the practicality of comparing several concepts in an early design stage. Alternatively, this study presents and compares basic static and dynamic models to numerically estimate grasp performance. This was applied on an exemplary concept for a hydraulically operated hand orthosis grasping a circular object. The models were validated with an experimental set-up that does not require sensors at the contact interface. Static and dynamic model results were almost identical, where the static model could be around 10 times faster and is generally more robust to a high contact stiffness. Both models were unable to make accurate quantitative predictions, which is believed to be due to differences in used contact stiffness. However, the models were able to make correct qualitative comparisons, making it a valid method to compare and choose concepts in an early design stage.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald A Bos & Dick H Plettenburg & Just L Herder, 2019. "Simplifying models and estimating grasp performance for comparing dynamic hand orthosis concepts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0220147
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220147
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220147&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0220147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0220147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.