Author
Listed:
- Peter M Maloca
- Aaron Y Lee
- Emanuel R de Carvalho
- Mali Okada
- Katrin Fasler
- Irene Leung
- Beat Hörmann
- Pascal Kaiser
- Susanne Suter
- Pascal W Hasler
- Javier Zarranz-Ventura
- Catherine Egan
- Tjebo F C Heeren
- Konstantinos Balaskas
- Adnan Tufail
- Hendrik P N Scholl
Abstract
Purpose: To benchmark the human and machine performance of spectral-domain (SD) and swept-source (SS) optical coherence tomography (OCT) image segmentation, i.e., pixel-wise classification, for the compartments vitreous, retina, choroid, sclera. Methods: A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained on OCT B-scan images annotated by a senior ground truth expert retina specialist to segment the posterior eye compartments. Independent benchmark data sets (30 SDOCT and 30 SSOCT) were manually segmented by three classes of graders with varying levels of ophthalmic proficiencies. Nine graders contributed to benchmark an additional 60 images in three consecutive runs. Inter-human and intra-human class agreement was measured and compared to the CNN results. Results: The CNN training data consisted of a total of 6210 manually segmented images derived from 2070 B-scans (1046 SDOCT and 1024 SSOCT; 630 C-Scans). The CNN segmentation revealed a high agreement with all grader groups. For all compartments and groups, the mean Intersection over Union (IOU) score of CNN compartmentalization versus group graders’ compartmentalization was higher than the mean score for intra-grader group comparison. Conclusion: The proposed deep learning segmentation algorithm (CNN) for automated eye compartment segmentation in OCT B-scans (SDOCT and SSOCT) is on par with manual segmentations by human graders.
Suggested Citation
Peter M Maloca & Aaron Y Lee & Emanuel R de Carvalho & Mali Okada & Katrin Fasler & Irene Leung & Beat Hörmann & Pascal Kaiser & Susanne Suter & Pascal W Hasler & Javier Zarranz-Ventura & Catherine Eg, 2019.
"Validation of automated artificial intelligence segmentation of optical coherence tomography images,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, August.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0220063
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220063
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0220063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.