IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0219262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Avoidable hospitalizations in Brazil and Portugal: Identifying and comparing critical areas through spatial analysis

Author

Listed:
  • João Victor Muniz Rocha
  • Carla Nunes
  • Rui Santana

Abstract

Background: Hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions have been used to assess the performance of primary health care. Few studies have compared geographic variation in rates of avoidable hospitalizations and characteristics of high-risk areas within and between countries. The aim of this study was to identify and compare critical areas of avoidable hospitalizations in Brazil and Portugal, because these countries have reformed their primary health care systems in recent years and have similar organizational characteristics. Methods: An ecological study on hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions produced in Brazil and Portugal in 2015 was used. Geographic variation of rates were analyzed and compared at the municipal level. A spatial scan statistic was employed to identify clusters with higher risk of hospitalizations for acute and chronic conditions in each country separately. Socioeconomic and primary health care characteristics of critical areas were compared to non-critical areas. Results: There were high variations in rates of avoidable hospitalizations within and between Brazil and Portugal, with higher variations found in Brazil. A more evident pattern of rates was found in Portugal. Rates and cluster distribution of acute and chronic conditions had significant agreement for both countries. The differences in primary health care and socioeconomic characteristics between areas identified as high risk clusters and non-clusters varied between category of conditions and between countries. Conclusion: Brazil and Portugal presented expressive regional differences with respect to rates of avoidable hospitalizations, indicating that there is room to improve by reducing such events in both countries. Different areas presented distinct interactions between primary health care, socioeconomic characteristics, and avoidable hospitalizations. Results indicate that the primary health care reforms, with similar organizational characteristics in different contexts, did not produce similar results either between or within countries. Possible actions to reduce these events should be defined at a local level.

Suggested Citation

  • João Victor Muniz Rocha & Carla Nunes & Rui Santana, 2019. "Avoidable hospitalizations in Brazil and Portugal: Identifying and comparing critical areas through spatial analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0219262
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0219262
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0219262&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0219262?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mayara Lisboa Bastos & Dick Menzies & Thomas Hone & Kianoush Dehghani & Anete Trajman, 2017. "The impact of the Brazilian family health on selected primary care sensitive conditions: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreia Pinto & João Vasco Santos & Júlio Souza & João Viana & Cristina Costa Santos & Mariana Lobo & Alberto Freitas, 2020. "Comparison and Impact of Four Different Methodologies for Identification of Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-14, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leonardo Graever & Aurora Felice Castro Issa & Viviane Belidio Pinheiro da Fonseca & Marcelo Machado Melo & Gabriel Pesce de Castro da Silva & Isabel Cristina Pacheco da Nóbrega & Leonardo Cançado Mon, 2023. "Telemedicine Support for Primary Care Providers versus Usual Care in Patients with Heart Failure: Protocol of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomised Trial within the Brazilian Heart Insufficiency with Telemed," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Ferreira-Batista, Natalia N. & Postali, Fernando Antonio Slaibe & Diaz, Maria Dolores Montoya & Teixeira, Adriano Dutra & Moreno-Serra, Rodrigo, 2022. "The Brazilian Family Health Strategy and adult health: Evidence from individual and local data for metropolitan areas," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    3. Marcello Barbosa Otoni Gonçalves Guedes & Sanderson José Costa de Assis & Geronimo José Bouzas Sanchis & Diego Neves Araujo & Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli Da Costa Oliveira & Johnnatas Mikael Lopes, 2021. "COVID-19 in Brazilian cities: Impact of social determinants, coverage and quality of primary health care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Thomas Hone & Valeria Saraceni & Claudia Medina Coeli & Anete Trajman & Davide Rasella & Christopher Millett & Betina Durovni, 2020. "Primary healthcare expansion and mortality in Brazil’s urban poor: A cohort analysis of 1.2 million adults," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Natalia Nunes Ferreira‐Batista & Adriano Dutra Teixeira & Maria Dolores Montoya Diaz & Fernando Antonio Slaibe Postali & Rodrigo Moreno‐Serra & James Love‐Koh, 2023. "Is primary health care worth it in the long run? Evidence from Brazil," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(7), pages 1504-1524, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0219262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.