IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0218814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Texture analysis in 177Lu SPECT phantom images: Statistical assessment of uniformity requirements using texture features

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Sarnelli
  • Emilio Mezzenga
  • Alessandro Vagheggini
  • Filippo Piccinini
  • Giacomo Feliciani
  • Maria Luisa Belli
  • Francesco Monti
  • Marta Cremonesi
  • Corrado Cittanti
  • Giovanni Martinelli
  • Giovanni Paganelli

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to apply texture analysis (TA) to evaluate the uniformity of SPECT images reconstructed with the 3D Ordered Subsets Expectation Maximization (3D-OSEM) algorithm. For this purpose, a cylindrical homogeneous phantom filled with 177Lu was used and a total of 24 spherical volumes of interest (VOIs) were considered inside the phantom. The location of the VOIs was chosen in order to define two different configurations, i.e. gravity and radial configuration. The former configuration was used to investigate the uniformity of distribution of 177Lu inside the phantom, while the latter configuration was used to investigate the lack of uniformity from center towards edge of the images. For each VOI, the trend of different texture features considered as a function of 3D-OSEM updates was investigated in order to evaluate the influence of reconstruction parameters. TA was performed using CGITA software. The equality of the average texture feature trends in both spatial configurations was assumed as the null hypothesis and was tested by functional analysis of variance (fANOVA). With regard to the gravity configuration, no texture feature rejected the null hypothesis when the number of subsets increased. For the radial configuration, the statistical analysis revealed that, depending on the 3D-OSEM parameters used, a few texture features were capable of detecting the non-uniformity of 177Lu distribution inside the phantom moving from the center of the image towards its edge. Finally, cross-correlation coefficients were calculated to better identify the features that could play an important role in assessing quality assurance procedures performed on SPECT systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Sarnelli & Emilio Mezzenga & Alessandro Vagheggini & Filippo Piccinini & Giacomo Feliciani & Maria Luisa Belli & Francesco Monti & Marta Cremonesi & Corrado Cittanti & Giovanni Martinelli & Giova, 2019. "Texture analysis in 177Lu SPECT phantom images: Statistical assessment of uniformity requirements using texture features," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218814
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218814
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218814&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0218814?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.