IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0218803.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the effectiveness of monitoring relevant variations during IMRT and VMAT treatments by EPID-based 3D in vivo verification performed using planning CTs

Author

Listed:
  • Yinghui Li
  • Jinhan Zhu
  • Jinping Shi
  • Lixin Chen
  • Xiaowei Liu

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of monitoring relevant variations during treatments for electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based 3D in vivo verification performed using planning CTs. Methods: Experiments on two simple phantoms (uniform and nonuniform phantoms) and a thoracic phantom were analyzed in this study, and six relevant variations including the machine output, planning target volume (PTV) deformation, multileaf collimator (MLC) and Phantom shift (set-up errors), and gantry and couch angle shifts were evaluated. 3D gamma and dose-volume histogram (DVH) methods were used to evaluate the detection sensitivity of the EPID-based 3D in vivo dosimetry and the dose accuracy of the EPID reconstruction, respectively, as affected by the variations, and the results were validated by determining the consistency with TPS simulated results. Results: The results of the simple phantoms showed that the gamma failure rates and DVH trend of EPID reconstructions were consistent with the results of TPS simulations for machine output and MLC shifts and inconsistent for phantom shift, gantry/couch angle shift and PTV deformation variations. The results of the thoracic phantom showed that CBCT-guided EPID reconstruction sensitively detected 3-mm Phantom shift in thoracic phantom and its gamma failure rates and DVH trend were consistent with the results of TPS simulations. Conclusion: The variations, such as machine output and MLC shift, that are phantom unrelated and cause changes in the beam of the linear accelerator can be sensitively detected by EPID-based 3D in vivo dosimetry and do not affect the accuracy of the EPID reconstruction dose. Planning CT will limit the detection sensitivity and the accuracy of the reconstruction dose of the EPID-based 3D in vivo dosimetry for phantom-related variations (such as Phantom shift and gantry/couch angle shift). EPID reconstruction combined with IGRT technology is a more effective method to monitor phantom shift variations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yinghui Li & Jinhan Zhu & Jinping Shi & Lixin Chen & Xiaowei Liu, 2019. "Investigating the effectiveness of monitoring relevant variations during IMRT and VMAT treatments by EPID-based 3D in vivo verification performed using planning CTs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218803
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218803
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218803&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0218803?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.