IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0218159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A novel data processing method CyC* for quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction minimizes cumulative error

Author

Listed:
  • Linzhong Zhang
  • Rui Dong
  • Shu Wei
  • Han-Chen Zhou
  • Meng-Xian Zhang
  • Karthikeyan Alagarsamy

Abstract

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is routinely conducted for DNA quantitative analysis using the cycle-threshold (Ct) method, which assumes uniform/optimum template amplification. In practice, amplification efficiencies vary from cycle to cycle in a PCR reaction, and often decline as the amplification proceeds, which results in substantial errors in measurement. This study reveals the cumulative error for quantification of initial template amounts, due to the difference between the assumed perfect amplification efficiency and actual one in each amplification cycle. The novel CyC* method involves determination of both the earliest amplification cycle detectable above background (“outlier” C*) and the amplification efficiency over the cycle range from C* to the next two amplification cycles; subsequent analysis allows the calculation of initial template amount with minimal cumulative error. Simulation tests indicated that the CyC* method resulted in significantly less variation in the predicted initial DNA level represented as fluorescence intensity F0 when the outlier cycle C* was advanced to an earlier cycle. Performance comparison revealed that CyC* was better than the majority of 13 established qPCR data analysis methods in terms of bias, linearity, reproducibility, and resolution. Actual PCR test also suggested that relative expression levels of nine genes in tea leaves obtained using CyC* were much closer to the real value than those obtained with the conventional 2-ΔΔCt method. Our data indicated that increasing the input of initial template was effective in advancing emergence of the earliest amplification cycle among the tested variants. A computer program (CyC* method) was compiled to perform the data processing. This novel method can minimize cumulative error over the amplification process, and thus, can improve qPCR analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Linzhong Zhang & Rui Dong & Shu Wei & Han-Chen Zhou & Meng-Xian Zhang & Karthikeyan Alagarsamy, 2019. "A novel data processing method CyC* for quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction minimizes cumulative error," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218159
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218159
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218159&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0218159?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michele Guescini & Davide Sisti & Marco B L Rocchi & Renato Panebianco & Pasquale Tibollo & Vilberto Stocchi, 2013. "Accurate and Precise DNA Quantification in the Presence of Different Amplification Efficiencies Using an Improved Cy0 Method," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-11, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agustin Gonzalez-Vicente & Jeffrey L Garvin & Ulrich Hopfer, 2018. "Transcriptome signature for dietary fructose-specific changes in rat renal cortex: A quantitative approach to physiological relevance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0218159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.