IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0217412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New insights into the prevalence of depressive symptoms and depression in rheumatoid arthritis – Implications from the prospective multicenter VADERA II study

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Englbrecht
  • Rieke Alten
  • Martin Aringer
  • Christoph G Baerwald
  • Harald Burkhardt
  • Nancy Eby
  • Jan-Paul Flacke
  • Gerhard Fliedner
  • Ulf Henkemeier
  • Michael W Hofmann
  • Stefan Kleinert
  • Christian Kneitz
  • Klaus Krüger
  • Christoph Pohl
  • Georg Schett
  • Marc Schmalzing
  • Anne-Kathrin Tausche
  • Hans-Peter Tony
  • Jörg Wendler

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of depressive symptoms in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients using two previously validated questionnaires in a large patient sample, and to evaluate depressive symptoms in the context of clinical characteristics (e.g. remission of disease) and patient-reported impact of disease. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the previously validated Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Beck-Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) were used to assess the extent of depressive symptoms in RA patients. Demographic background, RA disease activity score (DAS28), RA impact of disease (RAID) score, comorbidities, anti-rheumatic therapy and antidepressive treatment, were recorded. Cut-off values for depressive symptomatology were PHQ-9 ≥5 or BDI-II ≥14 for mild depressive symptoms or worse and PHQ-9 ≥ 10 or BDI-II ≥ 20 for moderate depressive symptoms or worse. Prevalence of depressive symptomatology was derived by frequency analysis while factors independently associated with depressive symptomatology were investigated by using multiple logistic regression analyses. Ethics committee approval was obtained, and all patients provided written informed consent before participation. Results: In 1004 RA-patients (75.1% female, mean±SD age: 61.0±12.9 years, mean disease duration: 12.2±9.9 years, DAS28 (ESR): 2.5±1.2), the prevalence of depressive symptoms was 55.4% (mild or worse) and 22.8% (moderate or worse). Characteristics independently associated with depressive symptomatology were: age 2 (OR = 10.54) and presence of chronic pain (OR = 3.25). Of patients classified as having depressive symptoms, only 11.7% were receiving anti-depressive therapy. Conclusions: Mild and moderate depressive symptoms were common in RA patients according to validated tools. In routine clinical practice, screening for depression with corresponding follow-up procedures is as relevant as incorporating these results with patient-reported outcomes (e.g. symptom state), because the mere assessment of clinical disease activity does not sufficiently reflect the prevalence of depressive symptoms. Clinical trial registration number: This study is registered in the Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS00003231) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02485483).

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Englbrecht & Rieke Alten & Martin Aringer & Christoph G Baerwald & Harald Burkhardt & Nancy Eby & Jan-Paul Flacke & Gerhard Fliedner & Ulf Henkemeier & Michael W Hofmann & Stefan Kleinert & C, 2019. "New insights into the prevalence of depressive symptoms and depression in rheumatoid arthritis – Implications from the prospective multicenter VADERA II study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0217412
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0217412
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0217412&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0217412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0217412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.