IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0217097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between ECG predictors of cardiac resynchronization therapy benefit

Author

Listed:
  • Josef Halamek
  • Pavel Leinveber
  • Ivo Viscor
  • Radovan Smisek
  • Filip Plesinger
  • Vlastimil Vondra
  • Jolana Lipoldova
  • Magdalena Matejkova
  • Pavel Jurak

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment that reduces mortality and improves cardiac function in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, about 30% of patients passing the current criteria do not benefit or benefit only a little from CRT. Three predictors of benefit based on different ECG properties were compared: 1) “strict” left bundle branch block classification (SLBBB); 2) QRS area; 3) ventricular electrical delay (VED) which defines the septal-lateral conduction delay. These predictors have never been analyzed concurrently. We analyzed the relationship between them on a subset of 602 records from the MADIT-CRT trial. Methods & results: SLBBB classification was performed by two experts; QRS area and VED were computed fully automatically. High-frequency QRS (HFQRS) maps were used to inspect conduction abnormalities. The correlation between SLBBB and other predictors was R = 0.613, 0.523 and 0.390 for VED, QRS area in Z lead, and QRS duration, respectively. Scatter plots were used to pick up disagreement between the predictors. The majority of SLBBB subjects– 295 of 330 (89%)–are supposed to respond positively to CRT according to the VED and QRS area, though 93 of 272 (34%) non-SLBBB should also benefit from CRT according to the VED and QRS area. Conclusion: SLBBB classification is limited by the proper setting of cut-off values. In addition, it is too “strict” and excludes patients that may benefit from CRT therapy. QRS area and VED are clearly defined parameters. They may be used to optimize biventricular stimulation. Detailed analysis of conduction irregularities with CRT optimization should be based on HFQRS maps.

Suggested Citation

  • Josef Halamek & Pavel Leinveber & Ivo Viscor & Radovan Smisek & Filip Plesinger & Vlastimil Vondra & Jolana Lipoldova & Magdalena Matejkova & Pavel Jurak, 2019. "The relationship between ECG predictors of cardiac resynchronization therapy benefit," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-10, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0217097
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0217097
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0217097&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0217097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0217097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.