IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0216526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy of self-reported history of autoimmune disease: A pilot study

Author

Listed:
  • Julia A O'Rourke
  • Caitlin Ravichandran
  • Yamini J Howe
  • Jennifer E Mullett
  • Christopher J Keary
  • Sara B Golas
  • Amrita R Hureau
  • Morgan McCormick
  • Jeanhee Chung
  • Noel R Rose
  • Christopher J McDougle

Abstract

Research associating the increased prevalence of familial autoimmunity with neuropsychiatric disorders is reliant upon the ascertainment of history of autoimmune diseases from relatives. To characterize the accuracy of self-report, we compared self-reported diagnoses of 18 autoimmune diseases using an online self-report questionnaire to the electronic medical record (EMR) diagnoses in 1,013 adult (age 18–70 years) patients of a primary care clinic. For the 11 diseases meeting our threshold observed prevalence, we estimated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for self-reported diagnoses under the assumption that EMR-based diagnoses were accurate. Six diseases out of 11 had either sensitivity or PPV below 50%, with the lowest PPV for dermatological and endocrinological diseases. Common errors included incorrectly self-reporting type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), when type 1 DM was indicated by the EMR, and reporting rheumatoid arthritis when osteoarthritis was indicated by the EMR. Results suggest that ascertainment of familial autoimmunity through self-report contributes to inconsistencies and inaccuracies in studies of autoimmune disease history and that future studies would benefit from incorporating EMR review and biological measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia A O'Rourke & Caitlin Ravichandran & Yamini J Howe & Jennifer E Mullett & Christopher J Keary & Sara B Golas & Amrita R Hureau & Morgan McCormick & Jeanhee Chung & Noel R Rose & Christopher J McD, 2019. "Accuracy of self-reported history of autoimmune disease: A pilot study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0216526
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0216526
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0216526&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0216526?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0216526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.