Author
Listed:
- Yih-Ting Chen
- Heng-Jung Hsu
- Cheng-Kai Hsu
- Chin-Chan Lee
- Kuang-Hung Hsu
- Chiao-Yin Sun
- Chun-Yu Chen
- Yung-Chang Chen
- Yi-Ching Yu
- I-Wen Wu
Abstract
Daily urine protein (UP) loss is a cumbersome but important measurement to guide diagnosis and treatment of renal disease. Spot urine protein-creatinine ratio (UPCR) can been applied to estimate daily proteinuria. However, the correlations between spot and 24h proteinuria remain controversial. In this cross-sectional study, simultaneous collection of 24h and spot urines were performed from 1,039 (derivation cohort) and 204 CKD patients (validation cohort) of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, from 2007 to 2017. The correlations between spot UPCR and 24h proteinuria were compared. The mean age of patients of derivation and validation cohort was 63 and 55 years and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 62 ± 35 and 59 ± 36 mL/min/m2, respectively. The correlation coefficient was 0.819 between UPCR and 24hUP. Prediction equation was derived as: Log1024hUP (g) = 0.814 x Log10UPCR (mg/mg) + 0.110 x Gender– 0.004 x Age + 0.004 x Body weight (kg) + 0.002 x CKD stage coefficient– 0.018, where CKD stage coefficient: CKD stage G1 = 1, G2 = 2, G3a = 3.1, G3b = 3.2, G4 = 4, G5 = 5. Correlation coefficient between measured and predicted 24hUP among derivation group and validation group is 0.866 and 0.915, respectively. However, the agreement of spot and daily estimates was less pronounced with proteinuria > 3g than lower values in Bland-Altman analysis. Spot UPCR can accurately predict 24hUP in patients with daily proteinuria below 3g. The development of this equation may facilitate estimation of 24hUP in the clinical practice.
Suggested Citation
Yih-Ting Chen & Heng-Jung Hsu & Cheng-Kai Hsu & Chin-Chan Lee & Kuang-Hung Hsu & Chiao-Yin Sun & Chun-Yu Chen & Yung-Chang Chen & Yi-Ching Yu & I-Wen Wu, 2019.
"Correlation between spot and 24h proteinuria: Derivation and validation of equation to estimate daily proteinuria,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0214614
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214614
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0214614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.