IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0214581.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reproductive differences among species, and between individuals and cohorts, in the leech genus Helobdella (Lophotrochozoa; Annelida; Clitellata; Hirudinida; Glossiphoniidae), with implications for reproductive resource allocation in hermaphrodites

Author

Listed:
  • Roshni G Iyer
  • D Valle Rogers
  • Michelle Levine
  • Christopher J Winchell
  • David A Weisblat

Abstract

Leeches and oligochaetes comprise a monophyletic group of annelids, the Clitellata, whose reproduction is characterized by simultaneous hermaphroditism. While most clitellate species reproduce by cross-fertilization, self-fertilization has been described within the speciose genus Helobdella. Here we document the reproductive life histories and reproductive capacities for three other Helobdella species. Under laboratory conditions, both H. robusta and H. octatestisaca exhibit uniparental reproduction, apparently reflecting self-fertility, and suggesting that this trait is ancestral for the genus. However, the third species, H. austinensis, seems incapable of reproduction by self-fertilization, so we inferred its reproductive life history by analyzing reproduction in breeding cohorts. Comparing the reproductive parameters for H. robusta reproducing in isolation and in cohorts revealed that reproduction in cohorts is dramatically delayed with respect to that of isolated individuals, and that cohorts of leeches coordinate their cocoon deposition in a manner that is not predicted from the reproductive parameters of individuals reproducing in isolation. Finally, our comparisons of reproductive capacity for individuals versus cohorts for H. robusta, and between different sizes of cohorts for H. austinensis, reveal differences in resource allocation between male and female reproductive roles that are consistent with evolutionary theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Roshni G Iyer & D Valle Rogers & Michelle Levine & Christopher J Winchell & David A Weisblat, 2019. "Reproductive differences among species, and between individuals and cohorts, in the leech genus Helobdella (Lophotrochozoa; Annelida; Clitellata; Hirudinida; Glossiphoniidae), with implications for re," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0214581
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0214581
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0214581&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0214581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Torsten H. Struck & Christiane Paul & Natascha Hill & Stefanie Hartmann & Christoph Hösel & Michael Kube & Bernhard Lieb & Achim Meyer & Ralph Tiedemann & Günter Purschke & Christoph Bleidorn, 2011. "Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid evolution," Nature, Nature, vol. 471(7336), pages 95-98, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diletta Santovito & Leonardo Brustenga & Livia Lucentini & Federico Plazzi & Stefania Chiesa & Marco Passamonti, 2023. "Negative Evidence for Sex-Linked Heteroplasmy in the Nemertean Worm Notospermus geniculatus (Delle Chiaje, 1822)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-10, June.
    2. Dominique A Cowart & Miguel Pinheiro & Olivier Mouchel & Marion Maguer & Jacques Grall & Jacques Miné & Sophie Arnaud-Haond, 2015. "Metabarcoding Is Powerful yet Still Blind: A Comparative Analysis of Morphological and Molecular Surveys of Seagrass Communities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0214581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.