IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0213216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical validation of an evidence-based method to adjust Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy through a prospective interventional study in paediatric patients with Cystic Fibrosis

Author

Listed:
  • Joaquim Calvo-Lerma
  • Jessie Hulst
  • Mieke Boon
  • Carla Colombo
  • Etna Masip
  • Mar Ruperto
  • Victoria Fornés-Ferrer
  • Els van der Wiel
  • Ine Claes
  • Maria Garriga
  • Maria Roca
  • Paula Crespo-Escobar
  • Anna Bulfamante
  • Sandra Woodcock
  • Sandra Martínez-Barona
  • Ana Andrés
  • Kris de Boeck
  • Carmen Ribes-Koninckx
  • on behalf of MyCyFAPP project

Abstract

Background: A method to adjust Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis is not currently available. Objectives: To assess the in vivo efficacy of a method to adjust the dose of enzymatic supplement in CF extrapolated from previous in vitro digestion studies (theoretical optimal dose, TOD). Secondly, to assess how individual patient characteristics influence the expected coefficient of fat absorption (CFA) and thus to identify an individual correction factor to improve TOD. Methods: A prospective interventional study in 43 paediatric patients with CF from 5 European centres. They followed a 24h fixed diet with the theoretical optimal dose for each meal. Faecal collection was carried out between colorimetric markers in order to include all the faeces corresponding to the fixed diet. Beta regression models were applied to assess the associations of individual patient characteristics with the CFA. Results: Median CFA was 90% (84, 94% 1st, 3rd Q.) with no significant differences among centres. Intestinal transit time was positively associated with CFA (p = 0.007), but no statistical associations were found with and age, gender, phenotype or BMI. Regression model showed no improvement of the in vitro predicted theoretical optimal dose when taking individual patient characteristics into account. Conclusion: Strict adherence to the theoretical optimal dose of enzymatic supplement for a prescribed meal, led to median CFA levels at the clinical target of 90% with a low variability between patients. The proposed method can be considered as a first approach for an evidence-based method in PERT dosing based on food characteristics. Results have to be confirmed in free dietary settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Joaquim Calvo-Lerma & Jessie Hulst & Mieke Boon & Carla Colombo & Etna Masip & Mar Ruperto & Victoria Fornés-Ferrer & Els van der Wiel & Ine Claes & Maria Garriga & Maria Roca & Paula Crespo-Escobar &, 2019. "Clinical validation of an evidence-based method to adjust Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy through a prospective interventional study in paediatric patients with Cystic Fibrosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0213216
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213216
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213216&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0213216?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0213216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.