IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0213162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tify: A quality-based frame selection tool for improving the output of unstable biomedical imaging

Author

Listed:
  • Dean Philip John Kavanagh
  • Meurig Thomas Gallagher
  • Neena Kalia

Abstract

The ability to image biological tissues is critical to our understanding of a range of systems and processes. In the case of in situ living tissue, such imaging is hampered by the innate mechanical properties of the tissue. In many cases, this provides challenges in how to process large amounts of image data which may contain aberrations from movement. Generally, current tools require the provision of reference images and are unable to maintain temporal correlations within an image set. Here, we describe a tool–Tify–which can accurately predict a numerical quality score versus human scoring and can analyse image sets in a manner that allows the maintenance of temporal relationships. The tool uses regression-based techniques to link image statistics to image quality based on user provided scores from a sample of images. Scores calculated by the software correlate strongly with the scores provided by human users. We identified that, in most cases, the software requires users to score between 20–30 frames in order to be able to accurately calculate the remaining images. Importantly, our results suggest that the software can use coefficients generated from consolidated image sets to process images without the need for additional manual scoring. Finally, the tool is able to use a frame windowing technique to identify the highest quality frame from a moving window, thus retaining macro-chronological connections between frames. In summary, Tify is able to successfully predict the quality of images in an image set based on a small number of sample scores provided by end-users. This software has the potential to improve the effectiveness of biological imaging techniques where motion artefacts, even in the presence of stabilisation, pose a significant problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Dean Philip John Kavanagh & Meurig Thomas Gallagher & Neena Kalia, 2019. "Tify: A quality-based frame selection tool for improving the output of unstable biomedical imaging," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0213162
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213162
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213162&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0213162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denis Soulet & Alexandre Paré & Julien Coste & Steve Lacroix, 2013. "Automated Filtering of Intrinsic Movement Artifacts during Two-Photon Intravital Microscopy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William A. Mills & AnnaLin M. Woo & Shan Jiang & Joelle Martin & Dayana Surendran & Matthew Bergstresser & Ian F. Kimbrough & Ukpong B. Eyo & Michael V. Sofroniew & Harald Sontheimer, 2022. "Astrocyte plasticity in mice ensures continued endfoot coverage of cerebral blood vessels following injury and declines with age," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0213162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.