Author
Listed:
- Vitor M Almeida
- Sandro R Marana
Abstract
The optimum temperature is commonly determined in enzyme characterization. A search in the PubMed database for “optimum temperature” and “enzymes” yielded more than 1,700 manuscripts reporting this parameter over the last five years. Here, we show that the optimum temperature is not a constant. The catalytic activity of the mesophylic β-glucosidase Sfβgly was determined at different temperatures using different assay times and enzyme concentrations. We observed that the optimum temperature for Sfβgly changed by 5°C simply by modifying the assay length, and it was inversely correlated with enzyme concentration. These observations rely on the fact that close to the melting temperature, thermal denaturation continuously decreases the active enzyme concentration as the assay progresses. Thus, as the denaturation rate increases with increasing temperature, the bell-shaped curves observed in “activity versus temperature plots” occur only if the enzyme is denatured at and above the optimum temperature, which was confirmed using the thermostable β-glucosidase bglTm. Thus, the optimum temperature hardly reflects an intrinsic enzyme property and is actually a mere consequence of the assay condition. Thus, adoption of the “optimum temperature” determined under bench conditions for large-scale uses, which differ in assay length and enzyme concentration, may result in lower yields and financial losses.
Suggested Citation
Vitor M Almeida & Sandro R Marana, 2019.
"Optimum temperature may be a misleading parameter in enzyme characterization and application,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-8, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0212977
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212977
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0212977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.