IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0211335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equine syndromic surveillance in Colorado using veterinary laboratory testing order data

Author

Listed:
  • Howard Burkom
  • Leah Estberg
  • Judy Akkina
  • Yevgeniy Elbert
  • Cynthia Zepeda
  • Tracy Baszler

Abstract

Introduction: The Risk Identification Unit (RIU) of the US Dept. of Agriculture’s Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health (CEAH) conducts weekly surveillance of national livestock health data and routine coordination with agricultural stakeholders. As part of an initiative to increase the number of species, health issues, and data sources monitored, CEAH epidemiologists are building a surveillance system based on weekly syndromic counts of laboratory test orders in consultation with Colorado State University laboratorians and statistical analysts from the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. Initial efforts focused on 12 years of equine test records from three state labs. Trial syndrome groups were formed based on RIU experience and published literature. Exploratory analysis, stakeholder input, and laboratory workflow details were needed to modify these groups and filter the corresponding data to eliminate alerting bias. Customized statistical detection methods were sought for effective monitoring based on specialized laboratory information characteristics and on the likely presentation and animal health significance of diseases associated with each syndrome. Methods: Data transformation and syndrome formation focused on test battery type, test name, submitter source organization, and specimen type. We analyzed time series of weekly counts of tests included in candidate syndrome groups and conducted an iterative process of data analysis and veterinary consultation for syndrome refinement and record filters. This process produced a rule set in which records were directly classified into syndromes using only test name when possible, and otherwise, the specimen type or related body system was used with test name to determine the syndrome. Test orders associated with government regulatory programs, veterinary teaching hospital testing protocols, or research projects, rather than clinical concerns, were excluded. We constructed a testbed for sets of 1000 statistical trials and applied a stochastic injection process assuming lognormally distributed incubation periods to choose an alerting algorithm with the syndrome-required sensitivity and an alert rate within the specified acceptable range for each resulting syndrome. Alerting performance of the EARS C3 algorithm traditionally used by CEAH was compared to modified C2, CuSUM, and EWMA methods, with and without outlier removal and adjustments for the total weekly number of non-mandatory tests. Results: The equine syndrome groups adopted for monitoring were abortion/reproductive, diarrhea/GI, necropsy, neurological, respiratory, systemic fungal, and tickborne. Data scales, seasonality, and variance differed widely among the weekly time series. Removal of mandatory and regulatory tests reduced weekly observed counts significantly—by >80% for diarrhea/GI syndrome. The RIU group studied outcomes associated with each syndrome and called for detection of single-week signals for most syndromes with expected false-alert intervals >8 and

Suggested Citation

  • Howard Burkom & Leah Estberg & Judy Akkina & Yevgeniy Elbert & Cynthia Zepeda & Tracy Baszler, 2019. "Equine syndromic surveillance in Colorado using veterinary laboratory testing order data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0211335
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0211335
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0211335&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0211335?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernanda C Dórea & Beverly J McEwen & W Bruce McNab & Javier Sanchez & Crawford W Revie, 2013. "Syndromic Surveillance Using Veterinary Laboratory Data: Algorithm Combination and Customization of Alerts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Fernanda C Dórea & C Anne Muckle & David Kelton & JT McClure & Beverly J McEwen & W Bruce McNab & Javier Sanchez & Crawford W Revie, 2013. "Exploratory Analysis of Methods for Automated Classification of Laboratory Test Orders into Syndromic Groups in Veterinary Medicine," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-9, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nathan Bollig & Lorelei Clarke & Elizabeth Elsmo & Mark Craven, 2020. "Machine learning for syndromic surveillance using veterinary necropsy reports," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Ana Carolina Lopes Antunes & Dan Jensen & Tariq Halasa & Nils Toft, 2017. "A simulation study to evaluate the performance of five statistical monitoring methods when applied to different time-series components in the context of control programs for endemic diseases," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0211335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.