IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0210917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Direct medical and non-medical costs of a one-year care pathway for early operable breast cancer: Results of a French multicenter prospective study

Author

Listed:
  • Delphine Héquet
  • Cyrille Huchon
  • Anne-Laure Soilly
  • Bernard Asselain
  • Helene Berseneff
  • Caroline Trichot
  • Aline Combes
  • Karine Alves
  • Thuy Nguyen
  • Roman Rouzier
  • Sandrine Baffert

Abstract

Introduction: The organization of health care for breast cancer (BC) constitutes a public health challenge to ensure quality of care, while also controlling expenditure. Few studies have assessed the global care pathway of early BC patients, including a description of direct medical costs and their determinants. The aims of this multicenter prospective study were to describe care pathways of BC patients in a geographic territory and to calculate the global direct costs of early stage BC during the first year following diagnosis. Methods: OPTISOINS01 was a multicenter, prospective, observational study including early BC patients from diagnosis to one-year follow-up. Direct medical costs (in-hospital and out-of-hospital costs, supportive care costs) and direct non-medical costs (transportation and sick leave costs) were calculated by using a cost-of-illness analysis based on a bottom-up approach. Resources consumed were recorded in situ for each patient, using a prospective direct observation method. Results: Data from 604 patients were analyzed. Median direct medical costs of 1 year of management after diagnosis in operable BC patients were €12,250. Factors independently associated with higher direct medical costs were: diagnosis on the basis of clinical signs, invasive cancer, lymph node involvement and conventional hospitalization for surgery. Median sick leave costs were €8,841 per patient and per year. Chemotherapy was an independent determinant of sick leave costs (€3,687/patient/year without chemotherapy versus €10,706 with chemotherapy). Forty percent (n = 242) of patients declared additional personal expenditure of €614/patient/year. No drivers of these costs were identified. Conclusion: Initial stage of disease and the treatments administered were the main drivers of direct medical costs. Direct non-medical costs essentially consisted of sick leave costs, accounting for one-half of direct medical costs for working patients. Out-of-pocket expenditure had a limited impact on the household.

Suggested Citation

  • Delphine Héquet & Cyrille Huchon & Anne-Laure Soilly & Bernard Asselain & Helene Berseneff & Caroline Trichot & Aline Combes & Karine Alves & Thuy Nguyen & Roman Rouzier & Sandrine Baffert, 2019. "Direct medical and non-medical costs of a one-year care pathway for early operable breast cancer: Results of a French multicenter prospective study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0210917
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0210917
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0210917&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0210917?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolas Jay & Gilles Nuemi & Maryse Gadreau & Catherine Quantin, 2013. "A data mining approach for grouping and analyzing trajectories of care using claim data: the example of breast cancer," Post-Print inserm-00917359, HAL.
    2. Emil Victor Gruber & Stephanie Stock & Björn Stollenwerk, 2012. "Breast Cancer Attributable Costs in Germany: A Top-Down Approach Based on Sickness Funds Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-6, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claire M Duflos & Kamila Solecki & Laurence Papinaud & Vera Georgescu & François Roubille & Gregoire Mercier, 2016. "The Intensity of Primary Care for Heart Failure Patients: A Determinant of Readmissions? The CarPaths Study: A French Region-Wide Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Kristine Kreis & Marika Plöthner & Torben Schmidt & Richard Seufert & Katharina Schreeb & Veronika Jahndel & Sylke Maas & Alexander Kuhlmann & Jan Zeidler & Anja Schramm, 2020. "Healthcare costs associated with breast cancer in Germany: a claims data analysis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(3), pages 451-464, April.
    3. Amina Amadou & Thomas Coudon & Delphine Praud & Pietro Salizzoni & Karen Leffondré & Emilie Lévêque & Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault & Aurélie Danjou & Xavier Morelli & Charlotte Le Cornet & Lionel Pe, 2020. "Chronic Low-Dose Exposure to Xenoestrogen Ambient Air Pollutants and Breast Cancer Risk: XENAIR Protocol for a Case-Control Study Nested Within the French E3N Cohort," Post-Print halshs-03003523, HAL.
    4. Björn Stollenwerk & Thomas Welchowski & Matthias Vogl & Stephanie Stock, 2016. "Cost-of-illness studies based on massive data: a prevalence-based, top-down regression approach," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(3), pages 235-244, April.
    5. Yanmei Liu & Koustuv Dalal & Björn Stollenwerk, 2013. "The Association between Health System Development and the Burden of Cardiovascular Disease: An Analysis of WHO Country Profiles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-7, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0210917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.